Xtrusio AEO/GEO Audit

Simform wins on ChatGPT.

Not Bacancy.

20-query audit across ChatGPT, Gemini & Claude. Bacancy Technology is cited on 16 of 60 responses (26.7%). But never once as the #1 recommendation. ChatGPT mentions Bacancy in 50% of queries — always with hedge language. Gemini barely knows it exists at 5%.

This report was generated using Xtrusio, an AI visibility and demand intelligence platform that analyzes how companies appear across modern AI systems such as ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, and other generative engines.

The insights in this page are generated using Xtrusio’s proprietary research and content intelligence framework.

May 2026
20 Queries • 3 Platforms
Bacancy Technology
50%
ChatGPT
10 of 20 queries
0× #1 RANKINGS
25%
Claude
5 of 20 queries
ALWAYS RANK #2
5%
Gemini
1 of 20 queries
⚠ CRITICAL GAP
The Perpetual Runner-Up

Zero #1 rankings across 60 AI responses.

Bacancy is cited 16 times — but never once as the top recommendation. ChatGPT hedges every mention with “worth considering” and “can be useful.” Claude always places Bacancy at rank #2 behind Toptal or Simform. Gemini cites it exactly once. AI platforms see Bacancy as a backup option, not a category leader. Simform, with 21 total citations and multiple #1 rankings, owns the positioning that Bacancy’s 1,050-developer bench should command.

Section 2

Platform Scorecard

Bacancy Technology citation rate across AI platforms

Bacancy Citation Rate by Platform
ChatGPT
50%
Claude
25%
Gemini
5%
Competitor Comparison — Combined Citation Rates
Simform
35%
Bacancy
27%
ValueCoders
15%
Toptal
13%
The Scalers
12%
ChatGPT Best Platform — But With Caveats
ChatGPT cites Bacancy in 50% of queries — the highest of any platform. But every mention uses hedging language: “worth considering,” “can be useful,” “may fit.” Bacancy is positioned as a backup option, never the primary recommendation.
Gemini: Near-Total Invisibility
Only 1 citation on Gemini (5%) — for AI/ML staff augmentation (Q9). Bacancy is invisible for its core services: React/Node augmentation, DevOps, agile methodology, and end-to-end product builds. This is a 45-point gap vs ChatGPT.
Section 3

AI Visibility Leaderboard

Who owns the AI conversation — total citations across all platforms

Platform-by-Platform Breakdown
ChatGPT
10/20
Bacancy cited
Claude
5/20
Bacancy cited
Gemini
1/20
Bacancy cited
Simform
12
9
21
Bacancy
10
5
1
16
ValueCoders
6
1
2
9
Toptal
4
4
8
The Scalers
4
3
7
ChatGPT
Claude
Gemini
Citation Leaderboard
Simform: 21 citations (35%) Bacancy: 16 citations (27%) ValueCoders: 9 citations (15%)
27%
Bacancy
Simform21
Bacancy16
ValueCoders9
Citation Intensity Heatmap
ChatGPT
Claude
Gemini
Total
Bacancy
10
5
1
16
Simform
12
9
21
ValueCoders
6
1
2
9
Toptal
4
4
8
The Scalers
4
3
7
Simform Leads with 21 Citations
Simform outpaces Bacancy by 5 citations (21 vs 16) and holds multiple #1 rankings. Their “product engineering” positioning wins across ChatGPT and Claude, despite having a similar team size and Ahmedabad headquarters.
Zero #1 Rankings — A Structural Problem
Bacancy is the only company in the top 3 with zero first-rank citations. ValueCoders and Toptal both earn occasional #1 positions. Bacancy’s generalist positioning (100+ services) means AI platforms never identify it as THE specialist for any category.
Section 4

AI Positioning Audit

20 buyer-intent queries — click any row to see the exact question

Each query was written from the perspective of a real decision-maker researching software development and staff augmentation solutions. These personas represent the CTOs, VPs of Engineering, and startup founders whose AI search results determine whether Bacancy gets discovered.

Target Buyer Sector CTO, VP of Engineering & Startup Founders at US/UK/Canadian companies evaluating offshore development partners
RP
VP of Engineering
SaaS Product Company • Software • USA
7queries
Pain Points
Competing with FAANG for local senior devs at $180K+; team burned out on features + maintenance; board pressure to cut engineering costs 30% without losing velocity.
“best staff augmentation companies India”“hire React developers remote”
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7
NC
VP of Engineering
Trayt Health • Healthcare SaaS • North Carolina
7queries
Pain Points
HIPAA compliance limits vendor choices; needs specialized AI/ML devs for analytics; small team can’t build new features in-house; tight Series B timeline to ship.
“HIPAA compliant development outsourcing”“hire AI developers healthcare”
Q8 Q9 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14
EH
VP of Engineering
Vertical SaaS Company • Software • Canada
6queries
Pain Points
Legacy codebase needs modernization; can’t pause features to refactor; needs dedicated DevOps + enterprise security capacity; past timezone coordination pain.
“legacy modernization outsourcing”“dedicated DevOps engineers India”
Q15 Q16 Q17 Q18 Q19 Q20
# Query Topic Cluster Claude ChatGPT Gemini
1 Fast React/Node.js Staff Augmentation Staff Aug
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“I need to add 4-5 senior React and Node.js developers to my SaaS team within the next 30 days. We can’t wait 3 months for local hiring. What are the best staff augmentation companies that can onboard developers this fast?”

2 Offshore Maintenance Team Staff Aug
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“My engineering team is burned out shipping features and fixing production bugs at the same time. I’m considering hiring a dedicated offshore team to handle maintenance and bug fixes so my core team can focus on new product development. What companies do this well?”

3 Remote Team Cost Arbitrage Staff Aug
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“We’re a Series B SaaS startup competing with Google and Netflix for engineering talent. Local senior developers want $180K+ and we can’t match that. What are my realistic options for building a high-quality remote development team at a fraction of the cost?”

4 Developer Retention at Indian Firms Staff Aug
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“I’ve had bad experiences with offshore development shops that assign junior developers and then rotate them off projects. Which Indian software development companies are known for actually retaining dedicated developers on long-term engagements?”

5 Scale Team 8→20 with Managed HR Staff Aug
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“We need to scale our engineering team from 8 to 20 developers over the next 6 months, but we don’t want to deal with hiring, payroll, and HR in India. Which staff augmentation providers handle all of that and let me just manage the work?”

6 India vs Latin America Tradeoffs Staff Aug
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“I’m evaluating whether to hire a dedicated development team from India or use a nearshore team in Latin America. What are the trade-offs in terms of cost, communication, and developer quality for a SaaS product company?”

7 Hybrid Onshore-Offshore Model Staff Aug
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“Our board is pushing us to reduce engineering costs by 30% without reducing output. We currently have an all-US team. What’s the most effective way to build a hybrid onshore-offshore engineering model?”

8 Healthcare HIPAA-Compliant Devs Custom Dev
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“We’re building a healthcare SaaS platform that handles patient data. I need developers who understand HIPAA compliance and can work with our existing security frameworks. Which offshore development companies have real healthcare experience?”

9 AI/ML for Healthcare Platform AI/ML
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“I need to build an AI-powered analytics module for our healthcare platform but my team doesn’t have machine learning expertise. Should I hire an AI development company or use staff augmentation to bring in individual ML engineers?”

10 Offshore DevOps Specialist Cloud/DevOps
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“We’re struggling with our cloud infrastructure costs on AWS. I need a DevOps engineer who can optimize our Kubernetes clusters and implement proper CI/CD pipelines. Is it worth hiring a dedicated offshore DevOps specialist for this?”

11 End-to-End Product Build Custom Dev
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“My startup needs a complete product built from scratch — a mobile app plus web dashboard plus backend APIs. We have the UX designs ready but no engineering team. What are the best software development companies for end-to-end product builds?”

12 Alternative to Upwork Freelancers Staff Aug
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“We’ve been using freelance developers from Upwork for our product but the quality is inconsistent and we keep losing developers mid-project. What’s a more reliable alternative for getting consistent, dedicated development resources?”

13 Legacy PHP Modernization Custom Dev
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“I need to modernize our legacy PHP application and migrate it to a modern tech stack like Python and React. Which software development companies specialize in legacy application modernization without disrupting ongoing operations?”

14 Genuinely Agile Development Partner Staff Aug
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“We’re looking for a development partner that uses agile methodology properly — not just daily standups but actual sprint planning, retrospectives, and iterative delivery. Which companies are genuinely agile rather than just claiming to be?”

15 Salesforce Consulting/Developers Enterprise
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“Our CRM implementation is a mess. We need Salesforce developers who can clean up our existing configuration, build custom integrations, and train our team. What Salesforce consulting firms offer dedicated developer models?”

16 Production AI Chatbot / Agents AI/ML
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“I want to build an AI chatbot that integrates with our customer support workflow and can handle tier-1 inquiries automatically. Which development companies have actual experience building production AI agents, not just proof-of-concept demos?”

17 React Native App Optimization Custom Dev
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“We have a working mobile app built in React Native but it’s slow and has poor UX. I need a team that can optimize the performance and redesign the user experience without rebuilding from scratch. Who does this well?”

18 Fractional CTO for Fintech Founder Custom Dev
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“I’m a non-technical founder building a fintech product. I need a development partner who can act as a fractional CTO — helping me make technology decisions, hire initial developers, and build the first version of the product. What companies offer this kind of strategic plus execution support?”

19 SOC 2 / Enterprise Security Offshore Cloud/DevOps
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“We’re expanding our SaaS product to serve enterprise clients and need SOC 2 compliance, better security practices, and infrastructure hardening. Which offshore development companies understand enterprise security requirements?”

20 Real-Time Data Pipeline Engineering AI/ML
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“I need to set up a data pipeline that ingests data from multiple third-party APIs, processes it in real-time, and feeds our analytics dashboard. Which companies have strong data engineering teams that can build this kind of infrastructure?”

TOTAL 5/20 (25%) 10/20 (50%) 1/20 (5%)
Section 5

The Gemini Gap

Where Bacancy loses 45 percentage points vs ChatGPT

ChatGPT cites Bacancy on 10 of 20 queries (50%). Gemini cites it on just 1 (5%). That’s a 45-point gap. When a buyer asks Gemini the same question they’d ask ChatGPT, Bacancy simply doesn’t exist in the response. The queries below show the pattern:

“I need to add 4-5 senior React and Node.js developers to my SaaS team within the next 30 days.”

— Claude cites Bacancy (#2). ChatGPT cites Bacancy (#5). Gemini lists BIT Studios and VT Labs instead.

“We’re struggling with our cloud infrastructure costs on AWS. I need a DevOps engineer who can optimize our Kubernetes clusters.”

— Claude cites Bacancy (#2). ChatGPT cites Bacancy (#2). Gemini recommends Digital Mesh Softech instead.

“We have a working mobile app built in React Native but it’s slow and has poor UX.”

— Claude cites Bacancy (#2). ChatGPT cites Bacancy (#4). Gemini recommends Goji Labs and Utility instead.
19 Queries Missed on Gemini
Bacancy is invisible on Gemini for: staff augmentation (Q1–Q7), healthcare (Q8), DevOps (Q10), product builds (Q11), Upwork alternative (Q12), legacy modernization (Q13), agile (Q14), Salesforce (Q15), AI chatbot (Q16), React Native (Q17), fractional CTO (Q18), SOC 2 (Q19), and data engineering (Q20).
Pattern: Gemini Defaults to Niche Specialists
Unlike ChatGPT and Claude which recognize Bacancy’s breadth, Gemini favors hyper-specific firms: The Scalers for retention, Closeloop for healthcare, Digital Mesh for DevOps. Bacancy’s generalist positioning (100+ services) works against it on Gemini.
Same Question. Different Platforms. Different Winners.

Bacancy’s content exists. ChatGPT knows it. Claude knows it. But Gemini doesn’t. The single Gemini citation (Q9: AI/ML augmentation) shows Gemini only recognizes Bacancy’s AI positioning — not its core staff augmentation or development services. This isn’t a content problem; it’s a discoverability problem specific to Google’s AI system.

Section 6

AI Topic Authority Map

Service line × platform visibility

Topic AI Leader Bacancy Status
Staff Augmentation (React/Node) Toptal / Simform 2 of 3 platforms (never #1)
DevOps Specialist Hiring Simform 2 of 3 platforms (both R2)
Hybrid Onshore-Offshore Model Uplers 2 of 3 platforms
React Native Optimization Appinventiv / Rootstrap 2 of 3 platforms
Agile Development Partner Simform Claude only (1/3)
Healthcare HIPAA Development Mphasis / CitiusTech ChatGPT only (1/3)
AI/ML Staff Augmentation Fractal / Innowise Gemini only (1/3)
End-to-End Product Build Simform / Net Solutions INVISIBLE (0/3)
Legacy Modernization Persistent / Thoughtworks INVISIBLE (0/3)
Salesforce Consulting Persistent / Deloitte INVISIBLE (0/3)
AI Chatbot / Agents Fractal / Andela INVISIBLE (0/3)
Data Pipeline Engineering Simform / EPAM INVISIBLE (0/3)
Service Line
ChatGPT
Claude
Gemini
Staff Augmentation
9 queries
56%
33%
0%
Custom Software Dev
5 queries
60%
20%
0%
AI/ML & Data Engineering
3 queries
0%
0%
33%
Cloud & DevOps
2 queries
100%
50%
0%
Enterprise Platform (CRM/ERP)
1 query
0%
0%
0%

▸ Enterprise Platform (CRM/ERP) is the only service line with zero visibility across all three AI platforms. AI/ML is Gemini-only.

Staff Augmentation • 9 queries
ChatGPT56%
Claude33%
Gemini0%
Custom Software Dev • 5 queries
ChatGPT60%
Claude20%
Gemini0%
AI/ML & Data Engineering • 3 queries
ChatGPT0%
Claude0%
Gemini33%
Cloud & DevOps • 2 queries
ChatGPT100%
Claude50%
Gemini0%
Enterprise Platform • 1 query
ChatGPT0%
Claude0%
Gemini0%
Cloud & DevOps: Strongest Service Line
100% ChatGPT + 50% Claude visibility. DevOps hiring is where Bacancy’s “transparent billing” positioning resonates most strongly — both ChatGPT and Claude cite specific tooling (Jenkins, Docker, K8s).
5 Universal Blind Spots
End-to-end product builds, legacy modernization, Salesforce, AI chatbots, and data engineering — zero citations across all platforms. These represent significant revenue lines where competitors (Simform, Persistent, Thoughtworks) own the AI conversation.
Section 7

Methodology

How we conducted this Xtrusio AEO/GEO Audit

20-Query Buyer-Intent Testing
Tested 20 decision-maker intent queries across ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude. Questions mirror real CTO/VP Engineering research during discovery — staff augmentation, custom software development, AI/ML, DevOps, and enterprise platforms.
Competitor Scope
Simform (premium product engineering, Ahmedabad), ValueCoders (budget outsourcing, 20+ years), Toptal (elite freelance marketplace), The Scalers (dedicated teams with retention focus). All compete for the same SaaS buyer during discovery.
Client Research & Analysis
Deep-dive research on bacancy.com plus G2, Clutch, GoodFirms reviews and competitor lane mapping across staff augmentation, custom development, AI/ML, cloud/DevOps, and enterprise platform categories.
Section 8

Recommendations

Prioritized actions to close the Gemini gap and win #1 rankings

Phase 1 — 0–30 Days
Own “Staff Augmentation” on Gemini
  • Publish a definitive “Staff Augmentation Guide 2026” long-form page targeting the exact buyer queries Gemini misses (Q1–Q7)
  • Create comparison pages: “Bacancy vs Simform,” “Bacancy vs Toptal,” “Bacancy vs ValueCoders” — these are the companies AI platforms recommend instead
  • Amplify “transparent billing” and “backup developer policy” messaging across all service pages — these are the only attributes Claude consistently cites
Phase 2 — 30–90 Days
Convert “Worth Considering” to “#1 Recommended”
  • Narrow positioning from 100+ services to 3–4 hero categories: Staff Augmentation, DevOps Hiring, React/Node Teams, AI-Accelerated Development
  • Publish case studies with measurable outcomes (cost savings %, time-to-hire reduction, velocity metrics) for each hero category
  • Build a dedicated DevOps hiring page with Terraform, Kubernetes, and CI/CD content — this is Bacancy’s strongest category (100% ChatGPT, 50% Claude)
Phase 3 — 90+ Days
Close the 5 Universal Blind Spots
  • Create vertical-specific landing pages for product builds, legacy modernization, and Salesforce — categories where Bacancy currently has zero AI visibility
  • Quarterly Xtrusio re‑audits to track gap closure and #1 ranking progress
Continuous AI Visibility Tracking
Brands can improve their AI discovery using generative engine optimization tools like Xtrusio.

Bacancy Is Mentioned 16 Times. But Never Chosen First.

Let’s fix the Gemini gap and win #1 rankings.

This research report was generated using the Xtrusio Company Intelligence Module.