Xtrusio AEO/GEO Audit

Palantir wins on every platform.

Not Airis Labs.

Six weeks after Airis Labs exited stealth with $60M and a new category name, we tested 20 buyer-intent queries across ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini — the platforms defense CTOs, CIOs, and AI program managers actually use to research vendors. Airis Labs was cited on 1 of 60 responses (1.7%). Palantir Maven Smart System was cited on 22. “User-Generated Field Intelligence” — the category Airis created — appeared in zero responses across all three platforms.

The findings below come from Xtrusio, an AI visibility audit system built specifically for B2B buyer-intent testing. Every citation was verified by running 20 real prospect queries across three generative AI platforms.

Queries were written from the perspective of Combatant Command CTOs, federal law enforcement CIOs, and State National Guard J6 leaders — the exact profiles who evaluate defense AI platforms during procurement research.

July 2026
20 Queries • 3 Platforms
Airis Labs
5%
ChatGPT
1 of 20 queries
1× #1 (Oracle only)
0%
Claude
0 of 20 queries
⚠ CATEGORY BLACKOUT
0%
Gemini
0 of 20 queries
⚠ CATEGORY BLACKOUT
The Category That Doesn’t Exist Yet

Airis Labs created a category name — “User-Generated Field Intelligence” — that appears zero times across 60 AI responses.

When a Combatant Command CTO asks ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini for the best AI platform to process user-generated video during operations, the answer is Palantir Maven Smart System (cited 22 times), Anduril Lattice (9 times), or Axon Fusus (6 times). Airis was cited once — on the single question that explicitly asked about the Oracle Defense Ecosystem. On the other 19 buyer questions, AI has no representation that the UGFI category exists. That is a category-creation problem, not a marketing tone problem.

Section 2

Platform Scorecard

Airis Labs citation rate across AI platforms — and how it compares to the incumbents

Airis Labs Citation Rate by Platform
ChatGPT
5%
Claude
0%
Gemini
0%
Competitor Comparison — Combined Citation Rates Across 60 Responses
Palantir
37%
Anduril
15%
Axon Fusus
10%
BriefCam
10%
Leidos AIMES
7%
Airis Labs
2%
ChatGPT: Category-Adjacent But Absent
ChatGPT knows Airis exists because of Oracle Defense Ecosystem indexing — it cited Airis exactly once, on the direct Oracle question. On the other 19 buyer-intent queries, ChatGPT defaults to Palantir Maven and Anduril Lattice. Category creation has not landed.
Claude & Gemini: Zero-Retrieval Blackout
Both platforms scored 0 of 20 across two independent sessions each — a documented dual-verification zero. Claude and Gemini have no indexed representation of Airis Labs six weeks post-stealth, including on questions that directly reference the Oracle Defense Ecosystem where Airis is a confirmed member.
Section 3

AI Visibility Leaderboard

Who owns the defense video intelligence conversation across AI platforms

Platform-by-Platform Breakdown
ChatGPT
1/20
Airis cited
Claude
0/20
Airis cited
Gemini
0/20
Airis cited
Palantir
6
11
5
22
Anduril
3
4
2
9
Axon Fusus
2
4
6
BriefCam
1
3
2
6
Leidos AIMES
1
3
4
Airis Labs
1
1
ChatGPT
Claude
Gemini
Citation Leaderboard
Palantir: 22 citations (37% of 60 responses) Anduril: 9 citations (15% of 60 responses) Airis Labs: 1 citation (1.7% of 60 responses)
1.7%
Airis Labs
Palantir22
Anduril9
Airis Labs1
Citation Intensity Heatmap
ChatGPT
Claude
Gemini
Total
Palantir
6
11
5
22
Anduril
3
4
2
9
Axon Fusus
2
4
0
6
BriefCam
1
3
2
6
Leidos AIMES
1
3
0
4
Airis Labs
1
0
0
1
Palantir Owns Every Platform
Palantir Maven Smart System, Gotham, and AIP are cited on 22 of 60 responses — more than every other vendor combined. Palantir is the default AI answer for any defense video intelligence query, including for Airis’s stated buyer personas (SOF CTOs, CBP CIOs, State Guard J6s).
The Airis Category Is Missing From AI’s Vocabulary
Across 60 responses, no AI platform used the term “User-Generated Field Intelligence,” nor did any platform describe the distinct capability Airis has built. The closest adjacent terms — “full-motion video,” “OSINT,” “video analytics” — all route to different vendors.
Section 4

AI Positioning Audit

20 buyer-intent queries — click any row to see the exact question

Each query was written from the perspective of a real decision-maker researching defense video intelligence platforms for their agency. These personas represent the buyers whose AI search results determine whether Airis Labs gets discovered during procurement research.

Target Buyer Sector Chief Technology Officers, CIOs, and AI/Innovation leaders at U.S. Combatant Commands, State National Guards, Federal law enforcement agencies, and allied national security organizations
BS
Command Technology Officer (CTO)
Special Operations Command Pacific (SOCPAC) • U.S. Indo-Pacific Command • Kailua, HI
7queries
Pain Points
Multi-partner data-sharing across INDOPACOM allies; foreign-language user-generated video from Pacific AORs; gray-zone maritime and social-media intel; classified vs commercial cloud deployment tension. Direct structural parallel to SOCCENT CTO (existing Airis customer).
“AI platform for SOF video intelligence”“agentic intelligence platform combatant command”
Q1 • Q4 • Q7 • Q10 • Q13 • Q17 • Q19
SB
Assistant Commissioner & CIO
U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) • Federal LE • Washington, DC
7queries
Pain Points
Drone/aerial sensor video at ports of entry; bodycam volume from CBP officers; smuggling detection in mixed-source video; DHS-scale sovereign cloud requirements; FedRAMP/CUI compliance for AI vendors. Federal 100 award winner for data & AI.
“AI video intelligence for CBP”“sovereign AI platform DHS FedRAMP”
Q2 • Q5 • Q8 • Q11 • Q14 • Q16 • Q20
BS
Colonel & CIO (J6) — Data, AI, Cyber
Arkansas National Guard • State Guard • Little Rock, AR
6queries
Pain Points
Domestic operations video (disaster response, civil disturbance, border support); interoperability across 54 state/territory Guards; low-cost sovereign deployment (Guards don’t have SOCOM budgets); dual-use unclassified → classified pipeline. Direct parallel to Indiana Guard (existing Airis customer).
“AI video intelligence National Guard”“affordable video AI platform state defense”
Q3 • Q6 • Q9 • Q12 • Q15 • Q18
#Query TopicClusterChatGPTClaudeGemini
1Military intel — unstructured video processingUGFI
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“What AI platforms help military intelligence analysts process large volumes of unstructured video from disparate sources during active operations?”

2CBP — drone/bodycam/traveler videoUGFI
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“Which AI tools can Customs and Border Protection use to extract intelligence from drone footage, body cameras, and traveler-submitted video at ports of entry?”

3Interagency video/imagery fusionFusion
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“What software helps interagency task forces fuse video and imagery from multiple agencies — DoD, Coast Guard, CBP, FBI — into a single operational picture?”

4Cross-source incident reconstructionFusion
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“Which AI platforms let intelligence analysts search across CCTV, drone footage, and body camera video simultaneously to reconstruct an incident?”

5Smartphone/social video for border intelUGFI
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“What are the best AI solutions for turning smartphone video and social media footage into machine-readable intelligence for border security missions?”

6Air-gapped/classified video analyticsSovereign
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“Which video analytics platforms can operate in air-gapped or classified environments without sending data to a public cloud?”

7SOF entity/object tracking across videoAgentic
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“What AI tools help SOF analysts identify and track people and objects across different video sources and timelines during counterterrorism operations?”

8DHS user-generated video processingUGFI
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“Which AI platforms are used by DHS or federal law enforcement to process user-generated video evidence from public sources into structured intelligence?”

9Multi-agency counter-narcotics videoFusion
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“What software helps multi-agency counter-narcotics task forces analyze video from informants, open sources, and surveillance sensors together?”

10Agentic workflows for intel analystsAgentic
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“Which AI platforms provide agentic workflows — planning, retrieval, entity resolution — specifically for intelligence analysts?”

11Top video-intel platforms for US/alliesAI Inference
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“What are the most capable AI video intelligence platforms trusted by U.S. government and allied national security agencies today?”

12Emergency response/HADR video AIUGFI
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“Which defense AI platforms are designed for emergency response and disaster relief scenarios where video data comes from citizens, first responders, and drones?”

13Foreign-language video for OSINTAI Inference
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“What AI tools help intelligence teams process foreign-language video and audio from social media at scale for OSINT missions?”

14FMV from drones for combatant commandsAI Inference
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“Which platforms can turn full-motion video from drones and aerial sensors into searchable, structured intelligence for combatant commands?”

15Public safety bodycam & bystander videoUGFI
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“What AI software helps public safety agencies analyze bystander video and body camera footage to reconstruct events after an incident?”

16CV AI with sovereign deploymentSovereign
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“Which computer vision AI platforms serve U.S. defense and intelligence customers with self-hosted, sovereign deployment options?”

17Combat-proven ISR (real ops vs lab)AI Inference
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“What AI platforms are best for processing high-volume video ISR feeds during real-world combat operations rather than in lab environments?”

18Oracle Defense Ecosystem AI platformsSovereign
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“Which AI intelligence platforms integrate with the Oracle Defense Ecosystem or similar accredited government cloud infrastructure?”

19Reactive review to predictive detectionAgentic
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“What are the leading AI companies helping national security analysts move from reactive video review to predictive threat detection?”

20Geospatial/temporal patterns across sourcesFusion
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“Which AI platforms are best for extracting geospatial and temporal patterns from mixed video sources — CCTV, drones, bodycams, social media — across an incident timeline?”

TOTAL1/20 (5%)0/20 (0%)0/20 (0%)
Section 5

The Triple-Platform Silence

Where Airis loses to Palantir on Claude, Gemini, and 19 of 20 ChatGPT queries

The 20-query audit produced a consistent pattern: when a defense buyer asks an AI platform about video intelligence, the answer is Palantir. On some questions the answer is Anduril, Axon Fusus, or Leidos AIMES. On zero questions — across two of the three major AI platforms — is the answer Airis Labs. The single ChatGPT citation came from an Oracle-specific question and did not surface the UGFI category. Three representative queries below show how the loss compounds.

“What AI platforms help military intelligence analysts process large volumes of unstructured video from disparate sources during active operations?”

— Q1. This is Airis’s exact product description. All three AI platforms returned Palantir Maven Smart System (cited as the dominant DoD platform, 80,000+ users), Anduril Lattice, Leidos AIMES, and BAE GXP. Airis was not mentioned on ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini.

“Which AI intelligence platforms integrate with the Oracle Defense Ecosystem or similar accredited government cloud infrastructure?”

— Q18. Airis Labs is a publicly named member of the Oracle Defense Ecosystem. ChatGPT cited Airis here (the only citation across all 60 responses). Claude and Gemini both named the June 2026 cohort by vendor — Legion Intelligence, Quori, Resaro, Revobeam, Marlin Intelligence — and left Airis out of a list where Airis publicly belongs.

“What AI platforms are best for processing high-volume video ISR feeds during real-world combat operations rather than in lab environments?”

— Q17. Airis’s founder narrative is literally this: “built during a war and from a war zone.” All three AI platforms answered with Palantir Maven, Leidos AIMES, and BigBear.ai ConductorOS. The wartime-forged positioning did not register.
19 of 20 Queries Missed on ChatGPT
The one ChatGPT citation came from Q18 (Oracle Ecosystem). Every buyer-intent query about capability, deployment, or category returned Palantir Maven, Anduril Lattice, or Axon Fusus — not Airis.
20 of 20 Missed on Claude & Gemini
Both platforms scored 0/20 across two independent sessions each. This is a dual-verification zero — not a session anomaly. Claude and Gemini have no indexed representation of Airis Labs six weeks post-stealth.
Root Cause: Post-Stealth Training-Data Lag + Category Absence
Airis exited stealth May 27, 2026. All three AI platforms’ training data pre-dates or barely overlaps that window. Compounding the lag: “User-Generated Field Intelligence” has zero mentions across 60 responses — the category itself is absent, so even fresh indexing has nothing to attach to.
Same Question. Three Platforms. Same Winner.

A SOCPAC CTO, a CBP CIO, and a State Guard J6 walk into ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini and ask the same question about video intelligence. All three walk out with the same answer: Palantir Maven Smart System. Airis Labs’s $60M Series B, three co-founders with Palantir + IDF pedigree, SOCCENT deployment, and Oracle Defense Ecosystem membership — none of it currently appears in the AI conversation those buyers are having during procurement research.

Section 6

AI Topic Authority Map

Query heatmap — product line × platform

TopicAI LeaderAiris Labs Status
Unstructured video processing (military intel)Palantir MavenINVISIBLE (0/3)
Border management video intelligencePalantir / Anduril / CBP internalINVISIBLE (0/3)
Interagency data/video fusionPalantir Gotham / MavenINVISIBLE (0/3)
Air-gapped/sovereign video AIPalantir AIP / Clarifai / Google Distributed CloudINVISIBLE (0/3)
Agentic analyst workflowsPalantir AIPINVISIBLE (0/3)
FMV / drone / aerial ISRLeidos AIMES / Palantir MavenINVISIBLE (0/3)
Public safety bodycam / bystander videoAxon Fusus / BriefCam / VIDIZMOINVISIBLE (0/3)
Emergency response / HADR video AICLARKE (TAMU) / EAGLE-I (ORNL) / Axon FususINVISIBLE (0/3)
Oracle Defense Ecosystem member platformsLegion Intelligence / Quori / ResaroChatGPT only (1/3)
Predictive threat detection from videoAnduril / Palantir / Rebellion DefenseINVISIBLE (0/3)
Product Line
ChatGPT
Claude
Gemini
User-Generated Field Intelligence (UGFI)
7 queries
0%
0%
0%
Super Perspective / Multi-Source Fusion
4 queries
0%
0%
0%
Agentic Analyst Workflow
3 queries
0%
0%
0%
Sovereign / Air-Gapped Deployment
3 queries
33%
0%
0%
AI Inference on Visual Data
3 queries
0%
0%
0%

▹ Sovereign / Air-Gapped Deployment is Airis Labs’s only product line with any AI visibility — and only on ChatGPT, only through the Oracle Ecosystem query.

UGFI • 7 queries
ChatGPT0%
Claude0%
Gemini0%
Super Perspective / Fusion • 4 queries
ChatGPT0%
Claude0%
Gemini0%
Agentic Analyst Workflow • 3 queries
ChatGPT0%
Claude0%
Gemini0%
Sovereign / Air-Gapped Deployment • 3 queries
ChatGPT33%
Claude0%
Gemini0%
AI Inference on Visual Data • 3 queries
ChatGPT0%
Claude0%
Gemini0%
4 of 5 Product Lines at 0% Across All Platforms
UGFI, Super Perspective / Fusion, Agentic Analyst Workflow, and AI Inference on Visual Data all return zero Airis citations across all three AI platforms. These are Airis’s core capability lines.
Sovereign Deployment: The Only Non-Zero — And It’s Oracle’s Doing
The single ChatGPT hit came on the Oracle Defense Ecosystem question. That means Airis’s AI visibility today is entirely borrowed from Oracle’s ecosystem index — not from Airis’s own category, deployment story, or founder narrative.
Section 7

Methodology

How we conducted this Xtrusio AEO/GEO Audit

This research is based on Xtrusio’s proprietary AI visibility analysis framework, applied to the defense video intelligence category.

Company & Competitor Research
Analyzed airis-labs.com product positioning, Series B disclosure documents, named customer testimonials (SOCCENT, Indiana Guard, IDF TIU), and the Oracle Defense Ecosystem membership announcement. Mapped competitive lanes across Palantir, Anduril, Vannevar Labs, Percipient.ai, Preligens, BriefCam, Leidos AIMES, and Axon Fusus.
20-Query Buyer-Intent Testing
Tested 20 decision-maker intent queries across ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Questions mirror real Combatant Command CTO, Federal LE CIO, and State National Guard J6 research during procurement discovery. Multiple sessions were run per platform with primed sessions discarded per GridMatrix precedent; zero results were dual-verified.
Competitor Scope
Palantir (Maven Smart System, Gotham, AIP) as incumbent defense AI backbone; Anduril (Lattice) as edge-sensor + autonomy platform; Vannevar Labs (Decrypt) as AI-native OSINT specialist; Percipient.ai (Mirage) as closest video-intel-for-defense direct peer; Preligens as geospatial/FMV AI. All compete for the same defense buyer during discovery-phase research.
Section 8

Recommendations

Prioritized actions to move Airis Labs from category-invisible to category-defining

Phase 1 — 0–30 Days
Publish the UGFI Category Vocabulary Everywhere AI Trains
  • Ship a Wikipedia page (or seed the Palantir Maven page’s “alternatives” section) with the term “User-Generated Field Intelligence” and Airis as the named platform
  • Publish a founder byline in Defense One, Breaking Defense, or The War Zone that names UGFI as a category and distinguishes it from FMV, OSINT, and generic video analytics
  • Post the SOCCENT and Indiana Guard testimonials as case studies on airis-labs.com with quotable language AI can index
Phase 2 — 30–90 Days
Close the Palantir Gap on 5 Named Buyer Queries
  • Target Q1 (military intel unstructured video), Q4 (cross-source reconstruction), Q7 (SOF entity tracking), Q12 (HADR), and Q17 (real combat vs lab) — the queries where Airis’s actual capability directly maps to buyer language
  • Publish one deep-dive technical article per query topic on airis-labs.com/resources with the buyer’s exact question in the H1
  • Land 3 podcast appearances on defense-tech shows (Defense Tech Signals, War on the Rocks, Modern War Institute) with transcripts that include the Airis name repeated in indexable text
Phase 3 — 90+ Days
Anchor Airis to the Oracle Defense Ecosystem Story Publicly
  • Co-author announcements with Oracle when possible — the Q18 hit proves Oracle’s ecosystem indexing is Airis’s current best AI vector
  • Add named customer disclosures beyond SOCCENT / Indiana Guard / IDF TIU — ChatGPT explicitly flagged “publicly documented operational history is newer and less extensive than Maven’s”
  • Quarterly Xtrusio re‑audits to track platform-by-platform gap closure as training-data refresh cycles hit
Continuous AI Visibility Tracking
Brands can improve their AI discovery using generative engine optimization tools like Xtrusio. For a post-stealth defense company, the gap between where you are (1.7%) and where your peers already sit (Palantir at 37%) is not a marketing problem — it’s a category-definition problem, and it compounds every month AI training data refreshes without Airis in it.

Make the AI conversation cite Airis Labs.

Palantir has 22 citations. You have 1. Let’s change that.

This research report was generated using the Xtrusio Company Intelligence Module.