Xtrusio AEO/GEO Audit

Marsh and Aon answer every captive question.

Braxtone has held a CBB insurance-manager licence since 2015.

Braxtone Group is named in 15 of 60 AI answers, and it comes first in nine of them. Then you reach the five questions about captive feasibility, domicile, formation and management. There the score is 0 of 15. Marsh and Aon finish on 21 mentions each. So AI knows Braxtone for compliance work and for running insurance operations. It does not know Braxtone for captives, which the same company sells through its CBB-regulated insurance-management business.

The findings below come from Xtrusio, an AI visibility audit built for B2B buyer research. We asked 20 real prospect questions on three AI platforms and recorded every answer.

The questions came from the people who actually buy captive management, insurance outsourcing and claims services in the Gulf.

September 2026
20 Queries • 3 Platforms
Braxtone Group
40%
Claude
8 of 20 queries
3× RANKED FIRST
35%
ChatGPT
7 of 20 queries
6× RANKED FIRST
0%
Gemini
0 of 20 queries
⚠ ZERO IN BOTH RUNS
The Inversion

The lines Braxtone is best known for by AI are not the lines it is licensed for.

Compliance and governance work scores 100% on ChatGPT and 67% on Claude. Insurance management and run-off hits 75% on Claude. Captive services score 0 of 15 across all three platforms. Brokerage and employee benefits score 0 of 6. Captives sit under Braxtone’s CBB insurance-manager licence, and the website already covers all four captive stages. The content is there. The platforms are not connecting it to Braxtone.

Section 2

Platform Scorecard

Where Braxtone gets named, and where it does not

Braxtone Mention Rate by Platform
Claude
40%
ChatGPT
35%
Gemini
0%

ChatGPT names Braxtone less often than Claude, but it puts the name first six times out of seven.

Who Gets Named — Share of All 60 Responses
Marsh
35%
Aon
35%
Braxtone Group
25%
Pro Global
20%
WTW
20%
Sedgwick
18%
Crawford & Company
15%
Third among the tracked vendors in this audit
Only Marsh and Aon are named more often across the 60 answers. Braxtone finishes ahead of Pro Global, WTW, Sedgwick and Crawford. Nine of its 15 mentions come first, and its average position is 2.9.
Gemini returns zero in both runs
The scored Gemini run: 0 of 20. A second check run, which sits outside the 60 headline answers, also came back 0 of 20. Different competitors showed up each time. Braxtone showed up neither time.
Section 3

AI Visibility Leaderboard

Total mentions across all three platforms and all 20 queries

Platform-by-Platform Breakdown
ChatGPT
7/20
Braxtone named
Claude
8/20
Braxtone named
Gemini
0/20
Braxtone named
Marsh
8
8
5
21
Aon
8
8
5
21
Braxtone Group
7
8
15
Pro Global
5
4
3
12
WTW
3
5
4
12
Sedgwick
3
5
3
11
Crawford & Co.
2
5
2
9
ChatGPT
Claude
Gemini
Share of 60 Responses
Braxtone Group: 15 mentions (25% of 60 responses) Marsh: 21 mentions (35% of 60 responses) Aon: 21 mentions (35% of 60 responses)
25%
Braxtone
Marsh21
Aon21
Braxtone15
Mention Intensity Heatmap
ChatGPT
Claude
Gemini
Total
Marsh
8
8
5
21
Aon
8
8
5
21
Braxtone
7
8
0
15
Pro Global
5
4
3
12
WTW
3
5
4
12
Sedgwick
3
5
3
11
Crawford & Co.
2
5
2
9
Braxtone finishes above the specialist firms tracked here
Pro Global, WTW, Sedgwick and Crawford all finish below Braxtone on total mentions. And when Braxtone does appear, it is usually the first name given. Nine of its 15 mentions come first, six of those on ChatGPT.
Marsh and Aon finish level
Both finish on 21 mentions with the same split: 8 on ChatGPT, 8 on Claude, 5 on Gemini. Both are named across the captive and brokerage questions. Braxtone is named on none of them.
Section 4

AI Positioning Audit

20 buyer-intent queries — click any row to see the exact question

Every question here was written the way a real Gulf buyer would ask it. Three people, three different jobs: a conglomerate CFO looking at setting up a captive, a Bahraini insurer CEO looking at outsourcing, and an Omani insurer CEO looking at claims and assistance. What AI tells these three decides whether Braxtone makes the shortlist.

Target Buyer Sector Group CFOs at Gulf family conglomerates, plus CEOs and General Managers at insurance companies across Bahrain, Oman and the wider GCC
Buyer Personas
3 verified LinkedIn decision-makers behind these 20 queries
HT
CFO, Kanoo Global Investments
Yusuf bin Ahmed Kanoo Group • Diversified Conglomerate • Bahrain
Pain Points
Premiums climb every renewal across industrial, energy, shipping and property businesses, and none of the good years pay anything back. Wants to know if a captive adds up, which Gulf domicile to pick, and who runs it after the licence comes through.
“is a captive worth it for our group”“best domicile for a Gulf captive”
Queries 1–7Profile
AS
CEO & Board Member
Bahrain Kuwait Insurance Co (GIG Bahrain) • Insurance • Bahrain
Pain Points
Old portfolios sit on capital. Inspection cycles eat management time. Hiring a specialist team for every function costs more than it returns. Wants someone who can take run-off off the books, run functions in-house teams cannot justify, and get the company ready for the CBB.
“who manages insurance run-off in the Gulf”“outsourced insurance operations”
Queries 8–14Profile
HA
Chief Executive Officer
Liva Insurance SAOC • Insurance • Muscat, Oman
Pain Points
Motor claims are taking too long and the book looks like it is leaking money. Roadside assistance and replacement cars sell policies, but building that network in Oman is not the job she wants to take on.
“motor survey outsourcing Oman”“roadside assistance programme for insurers”
Queries 15–20Profile

Names, titles and companies were checked against public LinkedIn profiles. The pain points are scenarios we built from each person’s role and employer. None of them said these things to us.

Buyer Questions
All 20 questions, worded exactly as they were asked. Click a row to read the full question.
#Query TopicService LineClaudeChatGPTGemini
1Captive business caseCaptive Services✗✗✗
Exact question asked on all three platforms:

“Our group in Bahrain retains a lot of risk and our commercial premiums keep climbing every renewal. How do we assess whether setting up our own captive insurance company would actually make financial sense?”

2Choosing a Gulf domicileCaptive Services✗✗✗
Exact question asked on all three platforms:

“Which Gulf jurisdiction is the most practical domicile for a captive insurance company owned by a GCC industrial group, and what makes it better than the alternatives?”

3Feasibility studyCaptive Services✗✗✗
Exact question asked on all three platforms:

“What actually goes into a captive feasibility study, and who in the Middle East can carry one out to a standard a regulator will accept?”

4Day-to-day captive managementCaptive Services✗✗✗
Exact question asked on all three platforms:

“We need someone to run the day-to-day operations of a newly licensed captive — underwriting, accounting, regulatory filings, board reporting. Who provides captive management services in the Gulf?”

5Licensing timelineCaptive Services✗✗✗
Exact question asked on all three platforms:

“How long does it typically take to get a captive insurance licence approved by a Gulf regulator, and who can manage the whole application process on our behalf?”

6Group medical benchmarkingBrokerage & Benefits✗✗✗
Exact question asked on all three platforms:

“Our group runs several businesses in Bahrain with a few thousand employees between them, on separate medical and life programmes. Who can consolidate and benchmark that against the market?”

7Reinsurance capacityBrokerage & Benefits✗✗✗
Exact question asked on all three platforms:

“Our property and engineering programme needs reinsurance capacity beyond what local insurers will write. Who in Bahrain can access international reinsurance markets for a mid-sized industrial risk?”

8Run-off portfolioInsurance Management✗✗✗
Exact question asked on all three platforms:

“We’re an insurer in the Gulf closing a loss-making line of business. Who can take over the run-off portfolio and manage it through to expiry?”

9Outsourced entity managementInsurance Management✓ #1✓ #1✗
Exact question asked on all three platforms:

“Rather than build an underwriting and operations team from scratch for a new insurance entity in the Gulf, can we outsource the entire management function? Who actually does that in the region?”

10Non-core portfolio exitInsurance Management✓ #7✗✗
Exact question asked on all three platforms:

“Our insurance company wants to exit a non-core portfolio without damaging policyholder relationships. What are our options, and who supports that kind of transaction in the Middle East?”

11Underwriting & credit controlInsurance Management✓ #2✓ #1✗
Exact question asked on all three platforms:

“Who provides outsourced underwriting, accounting, credit control and receivables management to insurance companies operating in the GCC?”

12Inspection readinessCompliance & Governance✓ #5✓ #1✗
Exact question asked on all three platforms:

“We’re preparing for a central bank inspection of our insurance operation. Who can run a compliance gap analysis and get us properly ready beforehand?”

13Broking licence applicationCompliance & Governance✗✓ #1✗
Exact question asked on all three platforms:

“What’s involved in getting a new insurance broking licence approved in the Gulf, and who handles that process end to end?”

14Governance training & manualsCompliance & Governance✓ #6✓ #1✗
Exact question asked on all three platforms:

“Our board wants corporate governance training and a proper set of policies and procedures manuals for our insurance company. Who provides that in the region?”

15Motor survey at volumeClaims & Loss Adjusting✗✗✗
Exact question asked on all three platforms:

“Our motor claims turnaround is too slow. Who can handle motor surveys and repair-cost assessment for us at volume across the Gulf?”

16Complex loss adjustingClaims & Loss Adjusting✗✓ #7✗
Exact question asked on all three platforms:

“Which loss adjusting firms in the region handle complex property, engineering and marine claims for insurers?”

17Pre-risk inspectionClaims & Loss Adjusting✗✗✗
Exact question asked on all three platforms:

“Before we write a large commercial property risk in the Gulf, who can carry out a pre-risk inspection and give us a proper risk report with recommendations?”

18Claims leakage reviewClaims & Loss Adjusting✓ #7✓ #1✗
Exact question asked on all three platforms:

“We suspect claims leakage in our motor book. Who can do a closed-file review and tell us where we’re overpaying?”

19Roadside & car replacementAssistance Programmes✓ #1✗✗
Exact question asked on all three platforms:

“We want to add 24/7 roadside assistance and a replacement car benefit to our motor policies in Oman and Bahrain. Which providers can run that programme for us?”

20Home emergency assistanceAssistance Programmes✓ #1✗✗
Exact question asked on all three platforms:

“Who runs home emergency assistance programmes — plumbing, electrical, AC breakdown — that insurers in the GCC can bundle into home policies?”

TOTAL8/20 • 3×#17/20 • 6×#10/20 • 0×#1

▹ The number after each tick is where Braxtone sat in that answer. Questions 1 to 8 draw a blank on all three platforms. That covers every captive and brokerage question, plus the first run-off question. Average position across the 15 mentions: 2.9.

Section 5

The Gemini Blackout

Zero mentions in both tested runs

We ran Gemini twice on the same 20 questions, once in a structured format and once as a normal conversation. The scored run came back 0 of 20. The second run, which sits outside the 60 headline answers, also came back 0 of 20. Each run named a different set of smaller regional firms. Neither named Braxtone. On outsourced insurance management, where ChatGPT and Claude both lead with Braxtone, Gemini answers with other companies entirely.

“Rather than build an underwriting and operations team from scratch for a new insurance entity in the Gulf, can we outsource the entire management function? Who actually does that in the region?”

— ChatGPT and Claude both name Braxtone first. Gemini names Pro Global, WNS and a set of third-party administrators.

“We want to add 24/7 roadside assistance and a replacement car benefit to our motor policies in Oman and Bahrain. Which providers can run that programme for us?”

— Claude names Braxtone first. Gemini and ChatGPT both answer with Gulf Assist, described as Bahrain-based.

“We’re preparing for a central bank inspection of our insurance operation. Who can run a compliance gap analysis and get us properly ready beforehand?”

— ChatGPT places Braxtone first and Claude names it fifth. Gemini answers with the Big Four and Protiviti.
All 20 queries missed
Captives, brokerage, run-off, compliance, claims, assistance. Every service line comes back empty, in both runs.
The result held across two formats
Two runs, two different competitor lists, the same zero for Braxtone. That tells us the gap is repeatable. It does not tell us why. Retrieval, source authority, how the name is associated — the audit cannot separate those.
One-third of the audit returns nothing

Braxtone reaches 40% on Claude and 35% on ChatGPT, and leads the answer nine times. On Gemini it is 0 of 20, twice over. Same company, same 20 questions, same week. A buyer who got these Gemini answers would not have Braxtone on the shortlist.

Section 6

AI Topic Authority Map

Query performance by service line and platform

TopicMost Often First-Named In Tested AnswersBraxtone Status
Captive feasibility & domicile choiceMarsh, AonNOT NAMED (0/3)
Captive formation & managementMarsh, AonNOT NAMED (0/3)
Employee benefits & brokerageAon, Marsh, HowdenNOT NAMED (0/3)
Reinsurance market accessAon, Guy Carpenter, WTWNOT NAMED (0/3)
Run-off portfolio transferEnstar, Compre, Pro GlobalNOT NAMED (0/3)
Outsourced insurance managementBraxtoneFIRST ON 2 OF 3
Outsourced underwriting & credit controlBraxtone2 of 3 platforms
Regulatory inspection readinessBraxtone2 of 3 platforms
Broking licence applicationBraxtone, Al TamimiChatGPT only (1/3)
Governance training & manualsBraxtone2 of 3 platforms
Claims leakage & closed-file reviewBraxtone2 of 3 platforms
Motor survey at volumeAxxion, CrawfordNOT NAMED (0/3)
Complex property & marine adjustingSedgwick, Crawford, McLarensChatGPT only (1/3)
Pre-risk inspectionTÜV SÜD, Bureau VeritasNOT NAMED (0/3)
Roadside & home assistanceGulf AssistClaude only (1/3)
Service Line
ChatGPT
Claude
Gemini
Captive Services
5 queries
0%
0%
0%
Brokerage & Employee Benefits
2 queries
0%
0%
0%
Insurance Management & Run-Off
4 queries
50%
75%
0%
Regulatory Compliance & Governance
3 queries
100%
67%
0%
Claims Management & Loss Adjusting
4 queries
50%
25%
0%
Assistance Programmes
2 queries
0%
100%
0%

▹ Braxtone holds two CBB licences: Insurance Management (CR 95069-1), which captives sit under, and Insurance Brokerage (CR 169147-1). Those are the two lines with zero mentions on every platform.

Captive Services • 5 queries
ChatGPT0%
Claude0%
Gemini0%
Brokerage & Employee Benefits • 2 queries
ChatGPT0%
Claude0%
Gemini0%
Insurance Management & Run-Off • 4 queries
ChatGPT50%
Claude75%
Gemini0%
Regulatory Compliance & Governance • 3 queries
ChatGPT100%
Claude67%
Gemini0%
Claims Management & Loss Adjusting • 4 queries
ChatGPT50%
Claude25%
Gemini0%
Assistance Programmes • 2 queries
ChatGPT0%
Claude100%
Gemini0%
Compliance and governance is the strongest line
ChatGPT names Braxtone on all three regulatory questions and puts it first every time. Claude gets two of three. This is the one line where AI reaches for Braxtone by default.
Captive Services: 0 of 15 responses
Five questions, three platforms, nothing. Marsh and Aon are named on all five. This is the work Braxtone does through its CBB-regulated insurance-management business, and the website already describes it, client example included.
Section 7

Methodology

How this audit was run

This research uses the Xtrusio AI visibility framework. Twenty buyer questions on three AI platforms, and a record of who gets named and how high up.

01Testing
20-Query Buyer-Intent Testing
We put 20 real buyer questions to ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini. They are the questions a Gulf executive would type while shopping around, not searches for “Braxtone.” Six sessions in total, three of them scored, which is where the 60 answers come from.
02Personas
Persona-Driven Research
The questions came from three real people: a group CFO at a Bahrain conglomerate, the CEO of a Bahrain insurer, and the CEO of an Omani insurer. Each question tests something Braxtone should win, something anyone could win, or something a competitor is known to own.
03Competitors
Competitor Scope
We tracked whoever the AI platforms named. Marsh and Aon on captives. Charles Taylor and Pro Global on insurance management and run-off. Enstar and Compre on old portfolios. Sedgwick, Crawford and McLarens on adjusting. Gulf Assist on assistance. Each one takes a slice of Braxtone’s business, not the whole thing.

A mention means the company was named somewhere in the answer. We count it once per question per platform, however many times the name comes up. Rank is where it sat in the list. Competitor totals show how many of the 20 questions each firm was named on. We did not track source URLs. All of this comes from one week of testing in September 2026, and AI answers move around between sessions and model updates, so the audit is built to be run again.

Section 8

Recommendations

What to fix first, and what can wait

What this plan has to closeSix service lines, ranked by how often AI names Braxtone
Service lineShare of answersMentionsWho takes the answer
Compliance & governance3 queries
56%5 of 9
Braxtone leads on ChatGPT
Insurance management & run-off4 queries
42%5 of 12
Contested with Pro Global, Charles Taylor
Assistance programmes2 queries
33%2 of 6
Gulf Assist takes both questions
Claims & loss adjusting4 queries
25%3 of 12
Sedgwick, Crawford, McLarens
Captive services5 queries
0%0 of 15
Marsh and Aon take all five
Brokerage & benefits2 queries
0%0 of 6
Aon, Marsh, Howden

Captives and brokerage are the two lines Braxtone holds CBB licences for, and the only two at zero. Phase 1 starts with captives, the bigger of the two at five questions.

01
0–30
days
Build out the captive pages4 actions

Five questions, zero mentions. This is the fastest gap to close because the content mostly exists already.

  • 01Give each captive stage its own page: feasibility, formation, licensing, ongoing management. Right now they share one tabbed sectionBigger lift
  • 02Write the Bahrain versus DIFC versus ADGM comparison. That is Question 2 word for word, and it backs up the other four captive questionsBigger lift
  • 03Move the CBB Insurance Manager licence and CR 95069-1 to the top of the captive pages. It currently sits in the group’s about copyQuick win
  • 04Publish captive case studies. Name the client if they agree; if not, still give the structure, the jurisdiction and the resultBigger lift
02
30–90
days
Get named where buyers are looking4 actions

Braxtone’s own pages are not the problem. Being absent from everywhere else is.

  • 01Find the captive directories and domicile guides buyers land on, then fix the ones Braxtone is missing fromQuick win
  • 02Get more independent coverage of Bahrain as a domicile. The Captive International interview is a startBigger lift
  • 03Tie the separate legal entities together under one Braxtone Group identity so a mention of any one helps the restQuick win
  • 04Write the Assistance page for insurers, not drivers: Bahrain and Oman coverage, member numbers, partners, service levelsQuick win
03
90+
days
Hold the wins, chase the losses3 actions

Compliance already wins on ChatGPT. Claims and assistance are still going to Crawford, Sedgwick and Gulf Assist.

  • 01The advisory content already comes first on ChatGPT. Build case studies and proof pages on top of itBigger lift
  • 02Rewrite the Claims pages in the words used in Questions 15 to 18, where Crawford and Sedgwick take the answer todayBigger lift
  • 03Re-run the Xtrusio audit every quarter and watch whether the captive and Gemini gaps closeQuick win
Continuous AI visibility tracking
Companies can track and improve how AI finds them using generative engine optimization tools like Xtrusio.

Marsh and Aon are answering questions Braxtone gets paid to answer.

Captives sit under its CBB licence. Let’s talk about what it takes to change this.

This research report was generated using the Xtrusio Company Intelligence Module.