Ask Gemini about supply-chain risk.
Prewave isn’t in the answer.
Across 20 buyer-intent questions on three AI platforms, Prewave is named in 23 of 60 answers (38%). ChatGPT names it 12 times and Claude 11 — but Gemini names it zero times, including on the LkSG and CSDDD questions Prewave markets hardest. On those questions, osapiens and IntegrityNext take the top positions ahead of Prewave.
The findings below come from Xtrusio, an AI visibility audit built for B2B buyer-intent testing. Every result was produced by running 20 real prospect questions across ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini and recording which vendors each platform named in its answer.
The analysis reflects how AI platforms name supply-chain risk and due-diligence vendors during discovery-phase research by procurement, sustainability and compliance leaders at large manufacturers.
Prewave is broadly visible on two platforms and absent on the third.
ChatGPT and Claude name Prewave on 55–60% of questions. Gemini names it on none of the 20 — including LkSG, CSDDD and EUDR, the exact queries Prewave positions hardest on. The same blackout hits osapiens, the vendor AI ranks first on those queries elsewhere. This is a cross-platform visibility gap; the audit records the pattern, not its cause.
Platform Scorecard
How often each platform named Prewave — and how often it ranked Prewave first
Each of the 20 questions was asked once on each platform. A question counts as a mention when Prewave is named or recommended in the answer text. Source links are not captured, so this measures whether the buyer sees the name, and where it lands in the order — not where the platform read it.
Counts are minimum confirmed mentions within the tracked competitor set, not a full market ranking. Sphera and Sayari also appear across Gemini and Claude but are largely absent from ChatGPT, so the roster differs by engine.
AI Visibility Comparison
Who owns the AI conversation — total mentions across all platforms
AI Positioning Audit
20 buyer-intent questions — click any row for the exact question and where Prewave ranked
| # | Question topic | Product line | Claude | ChatGPT | Gemini |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Automotive early-warning | Monitoring & Alerting | ✓#4 | ✓#2 | ✗ |
Exact question asked on all three platforms “What are the best software platforms for getting early warning of disruptions at our automotive suppliers before they stop our production line?” | |||||
| 2 | Real-time monitoring at scale | Monitoring & Alerting | ✓#3 | ✓#2 | ✗ |
Exact question asked on all three platforms “How can a large manufacturer monitor supplier risk in real time across thousands of suppliers instead of relying on annual audits?” | |||||
| 3 | Adverse-media / local alerts | Monitoring & Alerting | ✓#2 | ✓#1 | ✗ |
Exact question asked on all three platforms “We keep getting blindsided by supplier problems we only hear about weeks later. What tools give real-time alerts on supplier issues from news and local sources?” | |||||
| 4 | Crisis response time | Proactive Resilience | ✗ | ✓#2 | ✗ |
Exact question asked on all three platforms “What's the best way to reduce response time when a key supplier has a factory fire, strike, or bankruptcy?” | |||||
| 5 | Logistics / transport risk | Proactive Resilience | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
Exact question asked on all three platforms “Which supply chain risk platforms are strongest for predicting disruptions across logistics and transportation routes?” | |||||
| 6 | Single-supplier exposure | Proactive Resilience | ✗ | ✓#2 | ✗ |
Exact question asked on all three platforms “How do large industrial companies quantify how much of their spend is exposed to a single at-risk supplier?” | |||||
| 7 | Multi-country / language | Monitoring & Alerting | ✓#2 | ✓#2 | ✗ |
Exact question asked on all three platforms “What supplier risk monitoring tools work well for companies operating across many countries and languages?” | |||||
| 8 | Supplier sustainability rating | Sustainability & ESG | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
Exact question asked on all three platforms “What software helps manufacturers rate and improve the sustainability performance of their suppliers?” | |||||
| 9 | Scope 3 / CSRD reporting | Sustainability & ESG | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
Exact question asked on all three platforms “How can we track and report Scope 3 and ESG risks across our supplier base for CSRD reporting?” | |||||
| 10 | Env + human-rights deep-tier | Sustainability & ESG | ✓#7 | ✓#1 | ✗ |
Exact question asked on all three platforms “What tools help identify environmental and human-rights risks deep in a manufacturing supply chain?” | |||||
| 11 | Forced labour / UFLPA | Due Diligence & Compliance | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
Exact question asked on all three platforms “Which platforms screen suppliers for forced labour and help comply with the US UFLPA import rules?” | |||||
| 12 | EUDR raw-material chain | Due Diligence & Compliance | ✓#3 | ✗ | ✗ |
Exact question asked on all three platforms “What's the best software to prepare for the EU Deforestation Regulation across a complex raw-material supply chain?” | |||||
| 13 | ESG data, no questionnaires | Sustainability & ESG | ✓#5 | ✗ | ✗ |
Exact question asked on all three platforms “How can a sustainability team collect and verify supplier ESG data without sending out endless questionnaires?” | |||||
| 14 | Ratings recognised by EU buyers | Sustainability & ESG | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
Exact question asked on all three platforms “What supplier sustainability rating providers are most widely recognised by large European buyers?” | |||||
| 15 | LkSG due diligence | Due Diligence & Compliance | ✓#4 | ✓#3 | ✗ |
Exact question asked on all three platforms “What software helps German companies meet their supply chain due diligence obligations under the LkSG?” | |||||
| 16 | CSDDD evidence | Due Diligence & Compliance | ✓#4 | ✓#3 | ✗ |
Exact question asked on all three platforms “Which platforms are built to document due diligence evidence for the EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD)?” | |||||
| 17 | Map beyond tier-1 | Multi-Tier Transparency | ✗ | ✓#2 | ✗ |
Exact question asked on all three platforms “How can a manufacturer map its supply chain beyond tier-1 down to raw-material sources?” | |||||
| 18 | Hidden sub-tier links | Multi-Tier Transparency | ✗ | ✓#2 | ✗ |
Exact question asked on all three platforms “What tools uncover hidden sub-tier supplier relationships that a direct supplier list doesn't show?” | |||||
| 19 | Defensible audit trail | Due Diligence & Compliance | ✓#4 | ✗ | ✗ |
Exact question asked on all three platforms “How do companies build a defensible audit trail for supplier human-rights and environmental due diligence?” | |||||
| 20 | Disruption + compliance in one | Multi-Tier Transparency | ✓#1 | ✓#1 | ✗ |
Exact question asked on all three platforms “What supply chain risk platforms combine both operational disruption risk and sustainability compliance in one system?” | |||||
| NAMED • RANKED FIRST | 11/20 • 1×#1 | 12/20 • 3×#1 | 0/20 • 0×#1 | ||
✓ #N = named at rank N in the answer (order of appearance); ✗ = not named. On ChatGPT, Prewave ranked first on three of its twelve mentions; on Claude, once. Recorded on the test date; a repeat run can shift a rank by a place or two.
The Gemini Blackout
Where Prewave loses 55–60 points against its other platforms
On ChatGPT and Claude, Prewave is a familiar name in supply-chain risk answers. On Gemini it does not appear once — not on general monitoring, and not on the European-regulation questions it markets around. The same questions, asked on all three platforms, return Prewave twice and a different roster the third time.
“What software helps German companies meet their supply chain due diligence obligations under the LkSG?”
“Which platforms document due diligence evidence for the EU CSDDD?”
“What platforms combine operational disruption risk and sustainability compliance in one system?”
Prewave’s content and analyst standing exist — ChatGPT and Claude name it on most questions. Gemini surfaces a different set of vendors and never reaches Prewave. The next step is to identify which sources Gemini relies on for these questions and test whether stronger presence in relevant third-party sources improves Prewave’s visibility. This audit measures what the platforms say, not why.
AI Topic Authority Map
Which Prewave product lines the AI answers know — and who owns the rest
Each of the 20 questions maps to one of Prewave’s product lines. The percentage is the share of that line’s questions where Prewave was named on that platform.
| Question topic | AI leader | Prewave status |
|---|---|---|
| Real-time monitoring & alerting | Prewave / Everstream | NAMED 2/3 (ChatGPT, Claude) |
| Disruption + compliance, unified | Prewave | #1 on both engines that name it |
| Deep-tier ESG & human-rights | Sayari / EcoVadis | 2 of 3 (ChatGPT, Claude) |
| EUDR raw-material chain | osapiens / Sourcemap | Claude only (1/3) |
| LkSG / CSDDD due diligence | osapiens → IntegrityNext | Named, rank 3–4, 2 of 3 |
| Sustainability ratings | EcoVadis | INVISIBLE (0/3) |
| Forced labour / UFLPA | Kharon / Sayari | INVISIBLE (0/3) |
| Multi-tier mapping | Everstream / Sayari | ChatGPT only (1/3) |
4 queries
3 queries
5 queries
3 queries
5 queries
▸ Real-Time Monitoring & Alerting is the only Prewave product line named on every platform that returns it — and no line surfaces on Gemini at all.
Methodology
How this Xtrusio AEO/GEO Audit was run
This research uses Xtrusio’s AI visibility analysis framework. It reports what AI platforms say when buyers ask; it does not determine why any platform names or omits a vendor.
Recommendations
Prioritised actions to close the Gemini gap
Prewave is a strong runner-up on ChatGPT and Claude and absent on Gemini. Nothing below asks for new products. The work is to make the existing pages assert the specific claim each buyer question rewards, and to test whether stronger third-party category coverage improves Prewave’s position on the same queries.
Mention rate is the average share of a line’s questions where Prewave is named across the three engines. Every line is dragged to zero by Gemini; Sustainability and Resilience are weakest even on ChatGPT and Claude.
days
days
days
Prewave is visible on ChatGPT and Claude. Let’s close the Gemini gap.
The Gemini gap gives us a clear place to focus — and the differentiator answers to defend while we do.
