Xtrusio AEO/GEO Audit

ChatGPT cites Shippit on 22 of 25 queries.

Gemini misses 9 of them.

An independent 25-query audit of Shippit’s visibility across AI-powered search platforms. We tested the exact questions eCommerce Operations Managers, Heads of Logistics, and Supply Chain Directors ask when evaluating multi-carrier shipping and delivery management solutions in Australia and beyond.

February 2026
25 Queries Tested
3 AI Platforms
88%
ChatGPT
22 of 25 queries
✓ STRONG
64%
Gemini
16 of 25 queries
⚠ GAP RISK
88%
Claude
22 of 25 queries
✓ STRONG
The Core Finding

Shippit dominates ChatGPT and Claude — but loses 24 percentage points on Google’s Gemini, the AI platform embedded into the world’s most-used search engine.

When a Head of eCommerce asks Gemini about reducing freight spend, managing 3PL relationships, or handling large-format last-mile delivery — Shippit doesn’t appear. ChatGPT knows. Claude knows. Gemini sends that buyer to Starshipit and ShipStation instead. That’s not a content problem — it’s a distribution problem on Google’s AI ecosystem.

24pp
Gemini gap vs ChatGPT/Claude
9
Queries Gemini misses entirely
2
Queries invisible on all platforms
Section 2

Methodology

How we conducted this Xtrusio AEO/GEO Audit

This assessment combines Semrush AI Visibility data with manual buyer-intent query testing across AI platforms to reveal the real competitive landscape for Shippit — going beyond automated scores to test what eCommerce and logistics decision-makers actually ask during vendor discovery.

Semrush AI Visibility Data
Pulled Semrush AI Visibility reports for shippit.com and 2 direct competitors — starshipit.com and shipstation.com. Analyzed scores, mentions, cited pages, and audience reach across ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, and Gemini. Data as of February 2026.
Manual 25-Query Buyer-Intent Testing
Tested 25 decision-maker intent queries across ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude. Documented vendor citations, ranking positions, and response patterns. Questions designed to mirror real eCommerce Operations Manager, Head of Logistics, and Supply Chain Director research behavior during technology discovery.
Competitor Scope
Benchmarked against 2 direct competitors: Starshipit (ANZ-focused multi-carrier shipping automation, 30,000+ online stores) and ShipStation (global shipping software, 130,000+ merchants). Both compete for the same ANZ and APAC eCommerce buyer during the technology discovery phase.
Section 3

Why Semrush AI Visibility Scores Miss the Point

Automated scores track brand mentions — not buyer intent

Semrush AI Visibility gives Shippit a score of 36/100. That number is misleading in both directions — it overstates visibility by counting irrelevant brand mentions from merchant customer tracking, and it understates the real gap on Gemini where buyer-intent queries go unanswered.

Company Semrush Score Monthly Audience Mentions Cited Pages Buyer-Intent Citation Rate
Shippit 36/100 576K 333 (Gemini) est. 180+ 80% avg (3 platforms)
Starshipit ~28/100 ~210K est. 180 est. 120 Not tested
ShipStation ~42/100 ~1.8M est. 520 est. 310 Not tested
Semrush AI Visibility dashboard for shippit.com showing score 36/100 with 576K monthly audience
Semrush AI Visibility shippit.com — Score: 36/100  |  576K Monthly Audience
Semrush AI Visibility topics for shippit showing merchant customer brand mentions dominating tracked topics
Semrush AI Visibility — Topics shippit.com Topics — Merchant brands (Uniqlo, Koala) inflate the score

Semrush scores Shippit at 36/100 based on 576K monthly audience reach — but the Topics breakdown reveals a critical distortion: the majority of tracked mentions are consumer brand delivery queries like “Uniqlo delivery tracking,” “Koala Bar Stools shipping,” and “Little Wiwa Playmats order.” These are end-consumer tracking queries, not B2B vendor discovery. Semrush is measuring whether Shippit’s merchants appear in AI — not whether Shippit itself appears when a logistics manager asks for a recommendation. Our 25-query buyer-intent audit reveals the real picture.

The Brand Dilution Problem
Semrush counts every AI mention of Shippit — including delivery tracking queries from end consumers looking for their Uniqlo or Koala order. For a B2B shipping platform, this creates a score that reflects consumer pass-through traffic rather than buyer discovery intent. The 36/100 is measuring the wrong thing.
The Real Gemini Gap
Semrush shows 333 Gemini mentions — but those are dominated by consumer brand tracking. When we tested 25 actual buyer-intent queries on Gemini, Shippit appeared on only 16 (64%). On ChatGPT and Claude, the same queries produced 88% citation rates. That 24-point Gemini gap is what matters for pipeline.
Semrush AI Visibility dashboard for starshipit.com
Competitor Benchmark starshipit.com — ANZ-focused multi-carrier competitor
Semrush AI Visibility dashboard for shipstation.com
Competitor Benchmark shipstation.com — Global shipping software, higher Semrush score

ShipStation’s higher Semrush score reflects its larger global footprint and more extensive content library — but the score doesn’t tell you who wins in ANZ B2B discovery queries, where Shippit’s local carrier relationships and merchant network give it genuine competitive advantage. Starshipit, Shippit’s closest ANZ competitor, shows lower Semrush scores but competes for exactly the same buyer. The real differentiator isn’t automated scores — it’s who appears when an Australian eCommerce manager asks ChatGPT or Gemini for a recommendation.

Why This Matters

Semrush AI Visibility tracks all brand mentions across all AI platforms — including consumer parcel tracking that has nothing to do with vendor selection. This is why we use Xtrusio’s buyer-intent methodology to test what real logistics decision-makers actually ask during vendor discovery. Semrush gives you a score. Xtrusio tells you who wins when procurement is on the table.

Section 4

Platform Scorecard

Who wins the buyer’s attention — platform by platform

We tested 25 buyer-intent queries across ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude. Here’s how often each platform cited Shippit — and where the 24-point Gemini gap becomes a pipeline risk.

Shippit Citation Rate by Platform
ChatGPT
88%
Gemini
64%
Claude
88%
Shippit Ranked #1 — Queries per Platform
ChatGPT #1
13 queries
Gemini #1
7 queries
Claude #1
12 queries
ChatGPT & Claude: The Safe Platforms
88% citation rate across both ChatGPT and Claude, with 13 and 12 #1 rankings respectively, shows Shippit is deeply embedded in the training data of both platforms. Queries around ANZ carrier integrations, Shopify connectivity, and multi-carrier rate shopping consistently surface Shippit first.
Gemini: The 24-Point Gap
Gemini misses Shippit on 9 of 25 queries — a 24-percentage-point gap vs ChatGPT and Claude. Critically, the misses cluster on Shippit’s most strategic categories: cost reduction, 3PL management, large-format delivery, returns, and B2B logistics. These aren’t fringe queries — they’re pipeline-critical.
Universal Blind Spot: Fleet Management
Two queries are invisible across all three platforms: fleet dispatch management and large-format last-mile delivery (Q14, Q15). Yet Shippit’s NowGo product was built specifically for these use cases. The product exists. AI platforms just don’t know it.
Section 5

The Gemini Gap

Where Shippit goes invisible on Google’s AI ecosystem

Gemini is not a niche platform — it’s Google’s AI, embedded into Search AI Overviews and increasingly used for B2B research. The 9 queries where Shippit disappears on Gemini are not generic questions. They’re exactly the queries that should drive buyer consideration for Shippit’s most differentiated capabilities.

Q# Topic ChatGPT Gemini Claude Why It Hurts
Q1 Reducing eCommerce freight spend #1 Missed #1 Cost reduction is a top-5 buyer priority — Gemini sends them to competitors
Q7 3PL relationship management #1 Missed #1 Shippit’s carrier network is a core USP — invisible to Gemini on 3PL queries
Q10 Pet/specialty retail last-mile #1 Missed #2 Vertical-specific queries are where Shippit’s ANZ depth matters most
Q12 B2B + B2C unified fulfilment #2 Missed #1 Hybrid commerce is a growing segment — Shippit’s platform handles both
Q14 Fleet dispatch & driver management Missed Missed Missed NowGo product built for this — invisible across all AI platforms
Q15 Large-format last-mile delivery Missed Missed Missed NowGo’s core use case — zero AI visibility anywhere
Q22 Hidden shipping cost identification #1 Missed #2 Analytics and cost transparency is a key Shippit differentiator
Q24 Returns management platform #2 Missed #3 Returns is a growing priority for ANZ retailers — Shippit has product here
Q25 Enterprise SLA & carrier reliability #1 Missed #2 Enterprise buyers need SLA assurance — Shippit answers this on ChatGPT/Claude only

“We’re spending too much on freight. Which eCommerce shipping platforms give me real-time rate comparison across multiple carriers to help reduce our logistics costs?”

— Q1: Buyer-intent query tested across all 3 AI platforms. ChatGPT: #1. Claude: #1. Gemini: Missed entirely.

Cost reduction is the #1 logistics priority for eCommerce brands. When a Head of Operations searches Gemini for multi-carrier rate comparison — Shippit’s strongest value proposition — Gemini sends them to competitors. ChatGPT and Claude both name Shippit first on this exact query. The content exists. Google’s AI just isn’t surfacing it.

“Our furniture and homewares brand needs to ship large, bulky items. Which last-mile delivery management platforms in Australia handle oversized parcels?”

— Q15: NowGo’s flagship use case. Missed on ChatGPT, Gemini, AND Claude — complete AI invisibility for this product.

This is the sharpest strategic miss in the audit. NowGo was built specifically for large-format and fleet-based last-mile delivery — a growing category as furniture, fitness equipment, and appliance eCommerce scales in Australia. Not a single AI platform connects Shippit’s NowGo product to this query. A buyer searching for exactly this capability will find competitors instead.

But on the queries where Gemini does cite Shippit, the same questions produce strong results on ChatGPT and Claude too — proving the content exists.

Shippit #1 Rankings on Gemini — Queries Where It Does Appear
#1 — Shopify multi-carrier Australia
#1 — eCommerce shipping platform ANZ
#1 — WooCommerce carrier integration
#1 — Post-purchase delivery experience
#1 — Delivery tracking notifications
#1 — Shippit vs Starshipit comparison
#2 — Omnichannel fulfilment platform
Same Product. Different Platforms. Different Winners.

Shippit’s content exists. ChatGPT knows it. Claude knows it. But Gemini — embedded in Google Search, Chrome, and AI Overviews — doesn’t surface Shippit on 9 of the buyer’s most strategic queries. This isn’t a content problem. The carrier integrations, the rate comparison engine, the returns product — it all exists. It’s a Google AI distribution problem that is entirely fixable with structured content and citation signals.

Section 6

AI Positioning Audit

All 25 buyer-intent queries — citation results across all three platforms

Click any row to reveal the exact question tested. A number indicates Shippit’s ranking position among all vendors mentioned. A dash indicates Shippit was not cited.

# Query Topic Cluster ChatGPT Gemini Claude
Total Citations (of 25) 22 16 22
Citation Rate 88% 64% 88%
Section 7

Topic Cluster Heatmap

Where Shippit leads — and where buyers can’t find it on Gemini

Aggregated citation rates by topic cluster reveal a clear pattern: Shippit is universally strong on platform-centric and Shopify/WooCommerce queries, while Gemini has systematic gaps on cost, vertical, and NowGo-specific categories.

Topic Cluster
ChatGPT
Gemini
Claude
Platform & Shopify Discovery
100%
100%
100%
Post-Purchase & Tracking
100%
100%
100%
Vendor Comparison
100%
100%
100%
Automation & Dispatch
100%
100%
100%
Omnichannel Fulfilment
100%
50%
100%
Carrier & Rate Management
100%
50%
100%
Analytics & Cost Visibility
100%
0%
100%
Returns Management
100%
0%
50%
Vertical & Specialty Retail
100%
0%
100%
3PL & B2B Logistics
100%
0%
100%
Cost Reduction & Freight
100%
0%
100%
Fleet & Large-Format (NowGo)
0%
0%
0%
Universal Strength Zones
Platform discovery, post-purchase tracking, vendor comparison, and dispatch automation show 100% citation rates across all three platforms. These are Shippit’s safe territory — Shopify and WooCommerce connectivity is deeply embedded in AI training data and should be maintained with consistent content updates.
Critical Gemini Gaps
5 clusters show 0% on Gemini: cost reduction, 3PL management, vertical retail, analytics, and returns. All five have strong ChatGPT and Claude performance — proving the content exists. This is a Google AI distribution problem. And the NowGo fleet cluster is 0% everywhere — zero AI visibility for Shippit’s fleet product.
Section 8

Recommendations

A targeted action plan to close the Gemini gap and make NowGo visible

Shippit already dominates ChatGPT and Claude. The opportunity is focused: five topic clusters on Gemini and one product (NowGo) across all platforms account for the entire gap. These aren’t awareness problems — they’re content discoverability problems on Google’s AI ecosystem.

0–30 Days · Close the Universal Gaps
NowGo and Fleet Visibility — Zero to Cited
  • NowGo landing page rewrite: Reposition the NowGo product page with explicit buyer-intent language around “large-format last-mile delivery Australia,” “furniture delivery management platform,” and “fleet dispatch software.” Add FAQPage schema markup. Target: close Q14 and Q15 gaps across all three platforms.
  • B2B + B2C unified fulfilment guide: Publish a structured page titled “How to manage B2B and B2C fulfilment from one platform” with real merchant examples. Shippit handles this but AI platforms don’t surface it for Q12. Target: Gemini gap on hybrid commerce queries.
  • Vertical retail case study pages: Create dedicated pages for key verticals — pet retail, homewares, fashion — with specific carrier routing examples in Australia. Targets Q10 (specialty retail last-mile) gap on Gemini where ChatGPT already ranks Shippit #1.
30–90 Days · Gemini-Specific Optimization
Build the Content Google’s AI Will Cite
  • Freight cost reduction guide: Publish “How Australian eCommerce brands reduce shipping costs with multi-carrier rate comparison” with specific percentage savings from real customers. This directly addresses Q1 and Q22 — the cost reduction and hidden cost queries where Gemini sends buyers to competitors.
  • 3PL integration and management hub: Build a dedicated page on managing third-party logistics relationships through Shippit — including carrier onboarding, SLA tracking, and performance reporting. Targets Q7 (3PL management) and Q25 (enterprise SLA) gaps on Gemini.
  • Returns management solution page: Create a focused “Shipping Returns Management for ANZ eCommerce” page with process flow, carrier options, and customer examples. Returns is a growing buyer priority — ChatGPT and Claude already cite Shippit (Q24), but Gemini doesn’t.
  • Google Business Profile & entity markup: Ensure Shippit’s Google Business Profile is fully optimized with product categories, service descriptions, and structured data (Organization, SoftwareApplication schema). Google’s AI heavily weights its own entity graph for Gemini citations.
90+ Days · Own the ANZ AI Narrative
Build the Training Data Signal AI Platforms Need
  • ANZ logistics media placements: Earned placements in Inside Retail, Power Retail, and eCommerce News Australia specifically framing Shippit as “Australia’s leading multi-carrier shipping platform” — building Gemini training signal that ChatGPT and Claude already have. Anchor language: “multi-carrier,” “rate shopping,” “ANZ eCommerce fulfilment.”
  • Schema markup rollout: Implement FAQPage, Product, and SoftwareApplication schema across all product and solution pages — making content explicitly AI-crawlable. Priority pages: NowGo, Returns, Freight Analytics, 3PL Management, Carrier Integrations.
  • State of ANZ eCommerce Logistics report: Annual research report covering carrier performance, last-mile trends, and freight cost benchmarks for Australian retailers. Original research is the highest-authority content for AI platform citations — Gemini, ChatGPT, and Claude all prioritise citable statistics.
  • Quarterly Xtrusio re-audits: Re-run this 25-query audit every 90 days to measure Gemini citation growth as new content is published and indexed. Track NowGo visibility separately as the biggest gap product.
Xtrusio AEO/GEO Audit
Want to track how the Gemini gap closes over time?
Re-run this audit quarterly to measure citation growth as new content is published and indexed by Google’s AI.
Learn about Xtrusio

The Gemini Gap is Fixable. The Window is Now.

Before Starshipit finds their Google AI strategy, let’s own the narrative across every platform.