Sixty answers. Nineteen name Presgo.
On the ChatGPT shortlist. Nearly invisible on Gemini and Claude.
A property developer or food producer asking ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini which ESG reporting software to buy hears Presgo on 19 of 60 responses (32%). ChatGPT names it well — six times at #1. Gemini names it on just 3 of 20, and on the two questions Presgo should own by pedigree — audit-trail locking and board-level governance — it is absent on every platform. Workiva (30) and IBM Envizi (29) own the answer; Presgo sits third.
The findings below come from Xtrusio, an AI visibility audit system built for B2B buyer-intent testing. Every mention was recorded by running 20 real prospect questions across three generative AI platforms and reading the answer text — noting whether Presgo appeared and in what order.
Questions were written from the perspective of Heads of Sustainability and ESG leads at listed property developers and food producers evaluating ESG reporting software — not from Presgo’s own category vocabulary.
Presgo is strongest exactly where its product is loudest — and silent exactly where its heritage should win.
Presgo performs strongest on regional-framework questions on ChatGPT, while AI data quality is its clearest cross-platform strength. But on the two questions built for its own story — audit-trail locking (its “Data Locking by Financial Year” feature) and board-level governance — it is absent on every platform. Those answers go to Workiva and Diligent.
Platform Scorecard
How often each platform named Presgo — and how often it ranked Presgo first
Each of the 20 questions was asked once on each platform. A question counts as a mention when Presgo is named or recommended in the answer text. Source links are not captured, so this measures whether the buyer sees the name, and where it lands in the order — not where the platform read it.
Counts are minimum confirmed mentions within the tracked competitor set, not a full market ranking. Plan A also appears on 12 of 20 Gemini answers but is largely Gemini-specific, so it is noted separately rather than shown above.
AI Visibility Comparison
Who owns the AI conversation — total mentions across all platforms
AI Positioning Audit
20 buyer-intent questions — click any row for the exact question and where Presgo ranked
| # | Question topic | Product line | Claude | ChatGPT | Gemini |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SGX + Bursa in one platform | Disclosure & Frameworks | ✓#7 | ✓#1 | ✗ |
Exact question asked on all three platforms “We're a property developer listed in Singapore and also operating in Malaysia. What ESG reporting software can handle both SGX and Bursa Malaysia sustainability requirements in one platform?” | |||||
| 2 | Start small, two-person team | Platform & Governance | ✓#4 | ✓#1 | ✗ |
Exact question asked on all three platforms “Our sustainability team is just two people and we're starting ESG reporting for the first time. Is there reporting software we can start small with and expand later as requirements grow?” | |||||
| 3 | AI data pull + error flagging | Data Hub | ✓#2 | ✓#3 | ✓#1 |
Exact question asked on all three platforms “What AI-powered ESG reporting tools can automatically pull data from different departments and flag errors before we submit disclosures?” | |||||
| 4 | Report from raw data | Report Builder | ✓#2 | ✓#1 | ✗ |
Exact question asked on all three platforms “What software can generate a framework-aligned sustainability report from our raw data without starting from a blank document each year?” | |||||
| 5 | Supplier emissions data | Supplier ESG | ✗ | ✓#1 | ✓#4 |
Exact question asked on all three platforms “How can we collect emissions and ESG data from our suppliers to include in our own sustainability report?” | |||||
| 6 | Scope 1-3 for the auditor | Carbon Calculator | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
Exact question asked on all three platforms “What tools calculate Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions with clear methodology and verified emission factors we can show an auditor?” | |||||
| 7 | Double materiality assessment | Materiality | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
Exact question asked on all three platforms “What software helps run a double materiality assessment with stakeholder input for our sustainability report?” | |||||
| 8 | Templates that stay current | Disclosure & Frameworks | ✗ | ✓#4 | ✗ |
Exact question asked on all three platforms “We need our ESG disclosures to stay aligned with GRI and ISSB as the standards change. What reporting software keeps templates up to date automatically?” | |||||
| 9 | Targets & KPI early warning | Goals & Performance | ✗ | ✓#1 | ✗ |
Exact question asked on all three platforms “What ESG software lets us set targets and track KPIs over time so we can spot underperformance early?” | |||||
| 10 | HKEX + ISSB disclosure | Disclosure & Frameworks | ✗ | ✓#1 | ✗ |
Exact question asked on all three platforms “Which sustainability reporting platforms support Hong Kong HKEX and ISSB-aligned disclosure requirements for listed companies?” | |||||
| 11 | Centralise spreadsheet data | Data Hub | ✗ | ✓#4 | ✓#2 |
Exact question asked on all three platforms “What's the best way to centralise ESG data that's currently spread across spreadsheets from finance, HR, and operations?” | |||||
| 12 | Audit trail & data locking | Data Hub | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
Exact question asked on all three platforms “We're being asked for audit-ready sustainability data with a full trail. Which platforms give clear data lineage and locking of historical figures?” | |||||
| 13 | Software + expert support | Platform & Governance | ✗ | ✓#3 | ✗ |
Exact question asked on all three platforms “Is there ESG reporting software that also gives access to ESG specialists to help interpret the frameworks, not just a tool?” | |||||
| 14 | Voluntary SME standard | Disclosure & Frameworks | ✗ | ✓#3 | ✗ |
Exact question asked on all three platforms “Our company is too small for full CSRD but wants a credible sustainability report. Is there software built for the voluntary SME standard?” | |||||
| 15 | Full CSRD / ESRS in Europe | Disclosure & Frameworks | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
Exact question asked on all three platforms “Which ESG platforms are strongest for full CSRD and ESRS compliance for a company reporting in Europe?” | |||||
| 16 | One dataset, many frameworks | Report Builder | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
Exact question asked on all three platforms “Can any reporting tool produce one dataset that maps to several frameworks at once, so we don't re-enter data for each standard?” | |||||
| 17 | Supply-chain ESG risk | Supplier ESG | ✗ | ✓#4 | ✗ |
Exact question asked on all three platforms “How do companies assess ESG risk across their supply chain and bring that into compliance reporting?” | |||||
| 18 | Enterprise decarbonisation | Carbon Calculator | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
Exact question asked on all three platforms “What sustainability platforms do large enterprises use to manage decarbonisation and emissions across global business units?” | |||||
| 19 | ESG dashboards for leadership | Goals & Performance | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
Exact question asked on all three platforms “What tools help visualise ESG performance trends so leadership can make data-backed sustainability decisions?” | |||||
| 20 | Board oversight & governance | Platform & Governance | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
Exact question asked on all three platforms “Which platforms connect sustainability reporting with board-level oversight and governance controls?” | |||||
| NAMED • RANKED FIRST | 4/20 • 0×#1 | 12/20 • 6×#1 | 3/20 • 1×#1 | ||
✓ #N = named at rank N in the answer (order of appearance); ✗ = not named. On ChatGPT, Presgo was ranked first on six of its twelve mentions. Recorded on the test date; a repeat run can shift a rank by a place or two.
The Governance Blind Spot
Two questions Presgo should own by heritage — and loses on every platform
Presgo’s pedigree is governance. It is built by Azeus, the company behind Convene board-management software, and it markets “Data Locking by Financial Year” as a headline audit feature. Yet on the two buyer questions that map directly to those strengths, Presgo is named on none of the three platforms. The answers go to Workiva and Diligent instead.
“We’re being asked for audit-ready sustainability data with a full trail. Which platforms give clear data lineage and locking of historical figures?”
“Which platforms connect sustainability reporting with board-level oversight and governance controls?”
Presgo has the governance and audit story built in. The tested answers did not consistently associate Presgo with these governance and audit themes. The observed gap appears to be visibility-related rather than an obvious capability gap, based on the Presgo features mapped in this audit — which makes it a high-value place to focus. This audit measures what the platforms say, not why.
Product Line Authority Map
Which parts of the Presgo platform the AI answers know — and who owns the rest
Each of the 20 questions maps to one of Presgo’s modules. The percentage is the share of that line’s questions where Presgo was named on that platform.
| Question topic | AI leader | Presgo status |
|---|---|---|
| AI data quality & anomaly flagging | Presgo | NAMED 3/3 platforms |
| Modular start for small teams | Presgo | 2 of 3 (ChatGPT, Claude) |
| Report generation from raw data | Presgo | 2 of 3 (ChatGPT, Claude) |
| SGX + Bursa frameworks | Presgo, Workiva | 2 of 3 (ChatGPT, Claude) |
| HKEX + ISSB disclosure | Presgo (ChatGPT) | ChatGPT only (1/3) |
| Supplier ESG data | Mixed | 2 of 3 (ChatGPT, Gemini) |
| Audit trail & data locking | Workiva | INVISIBLE (0/3) |
| Board-level governance | Diligent | INVISIBLE (0/3) |
| Carbon accounting (Scope 1-3) | IBM Envizi / Watershed | INVISIBLE (0/3) |
| Full CSRD / ESRS (Europe) | Position Green / Workiva | INVISIBLE (0/3) |
| Double materiality | Novisto / Materiality Master | INVISIBLE (0/3) |
5 queries
3 queries
2 queries
2 queries
2 queries
3 queries
2 queries
1 query
▸ Carbon Calculator and Materiality are the only Presgo lines unnamed on all three platforms — and Disclosure & Frameworks scores 80% on ChatGPT but 0% on Gemini.
Methodology
How this Xtrusio AEO/GEO Audit was run
This research uses Xtrusio’s AI visibility analysis framework. It reports what AI platforms say when buyers ask; it does not determine why any platform names or omits a vendor.
Recommendations
Prioritised actions to close the governance and Gemini gaps
Presgo publishes a page for every module and is strong on ChatGPT. Nothing below asks for new products or new pages. The work is to make the existing module pages assert the specific claim a buyer question rewards, and to test whether stronger third-party category coverage improves Presgo’s position on the same queries.
Mention rate is the average share of a line’s questions where Presgo is named across the three engines. Carbon Calculator and Materiality are unnamed everywhere; every other line is dragged down by Gemini or Claude.
days
days
days
Presgo is strong on ChatGPT. Let’s make it visible everywhere.
The work is turning a one-platform win into three — and reclaiming the governance questions Presgo should own.
