Xtrusio AEO/GEO Audit

Clinch wins on ChatGPT. Innovid wins on Gemini.

AdGreetz? Zero of 75.

25-query audit across ChatGPT, Gemini & Claude. AdGreetz is cited on 0 of 75 responses across all 3 platforms (0%). AI platforms collectively named 80+ competing vendors — including niche tools like Plainly, Cropink, and Admagica — but never once mentioned AdGreetz, AdChef, or BizGreetz AI.

This report was generated using Xtrusio, an AI visibility and demand intelligence platform that analyzes how companies appear across modern AI systems such as ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, and other generative engines.

April 2026
25 Queries • 3 Platforms
0%
ChatGPT
0 of 25 queries
⚠ INVISIBLE
0%
Gemini
0 of 25 queries
⚠ INVISIBLE
0%
Claude
0 of 25 queries
⚠ INVISIBLE
The Core Problem

When a VP of Media asks any AI platform about personalized video advertising, AdGreetz does not exist.

Clinch appears on 22 of 25 ChatGPT queries. Innovid appears on 19. Smartly appears on 19. Even niche tools like Plainly and Cropink get mentioned. AdGreetz — with Amazon, P&G, BMW, and Disney as clients — gets zero. That’s not a branding problem. That’s an existential problem.

Section 2

Platform Scorecard

AdGreetz citation rate vs the competition

AdGreetz Citation Rate by Platform
ChatGPT
0%
Gemini
0%
Claude
0%
Who Owns AdGreetz’s Space — ChatGPT Citation Rates
Clinch
88%
Smartly
76%
Innovid
76%
Celtra
64%
Jivox
64%
AdGreetz
0%
Triple Zero — Total AI Invisibility
AdGreetz scored 0/75 across all three AI platforms. This is the worst possible result. Despite Amazon, P&G, BMW, Disney as clients, a Wikipedia page, MarTech Breakthrough Awards, and TikTok partnership — none of this registers in AI responses.
80+ Competitors Named Instead
AI platforms collectively named 80+ competing vendors across these 25 questions — including tiny tools like Plainly, Cropink, Confect.io, and Admagica. ChatGPT alone named 60+ vendors. Not once was AdGreetz, AdChef, or BizGreetz AI mentioned.
Section 3

AI Visibility Leaderboard

Who owns the personalized video ad-tech conversation across AI platforms

Platform-by-Platform Breakdown
ChatGPT
0/25
AdGreetz cited
Gemini
0/25
AdGreetz cited
Claude
0/25
AdGreetz cited
Innovid
20
10
19
~49
Clinch
18
10
22
~47
Smartly
14
8
19
~41
Celtra
18
8
16
~42
Jivox
15
8
16
~39
AdGreetz
0
Claude
Gemini
ChatGPT
0%
AdGreetz
Innovid~49
Clinch~47
Smartly~41
Citation Intensity Heatmap
ChatGPT
Gemini
Claude
Total
Innovid/Flashtalking
19
10
20
~49
Clinch
22
10
18
~47
Celtra
16
8
18
~42
Smartly
19
4
18
~41
Jivox
16
8
15
~39
AdGreetz
0
0
0
0
AdGreetz Is Last in Its Own Category
With 0 citations across 75 query-platform pairs (0%), AdGreetz is completely invisible in the personalized video ad-tech category. Five competitors each exceed 39 citations. The top 5 collectively appear on 90%+ of all queries.
The Competitive Moat Is Enormous
Clinch (22/25 on ChatGPT), Innovid (20/25 on Claude), Smartly (19/25 on ChatGPT) — displacing these entrenched players requires fundamental shifts in digital content footprint, not incremental improvements. Awards and press releases alone will not move the needle.
Section 4

AI Positioning Audit

25 buyer-intent queries — click any row to see the exact question

Each query was written from the perspective of a real brand media director, agency buyer, CTV publisher, or performance marketer researching personalized video ad-tech platforms. These are the exact questions buyers ask AI assistants during discovery.

BS
SVP, Connected Media
Keurig Dr Pepper • CPG • US
6queries
Pain Points
Creative production bottleneck, personalizing CTV at scale, proving ROAS on personalized vs generic creative across 15+ channels
“personalized CTV ads”“omnichannel creative platform”
Q1, Q2, Q3, Q12, Q19, Q20
JT
VP, North America
Walmart • Retail/Media • NYC
5queries
Pain Points
Managing creative across 10+ platforms, retailer-specific CTV personalization, Vizio/smart TV integration, CDP-driven creative
“dynamic CTV retail”“CDP creative personalization”
Q4, Q5, Q6, Q16, Q23
NO
Principal
XcessCPG • CPG/Retail Media • US
5queries
Pain Points
Agency-side creative automation, DCO competitive landscape, managed vs self-serve, holiday campaign orchestration
“DCO platform comparison”“creative ad tech landscape”
Q7, Q10, Q15, Q17, Q22
DP
CMO
Keurig Dr Pepper • CPG • Chicago
5queries
Pain Points
Marketing measurement, cross-channel attribution, generative AI for creative, end-to-end managed solution evaluation
“AI ad creative production”“end-to-end managed ad platform”
Q9, Q11, Q14, Q21, Q24
NW
VP Marketing
General Mills (Contract) • CPG • Minneapolis
4queries
Pain Points
OTT publisher dynamic ads, entertainment trailer personalization, automotive dealer-specific campaigns, government geo-targeted CTV
“OTT dynamic ads publisher”“geo-targeted CTV government”
Q8, Q13, Q18, Q25
#Query TopicClusterChatGPTGeminiClaude
TOTAL0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)
Section 5

Semrush AI Visibility

Automated scores vs buyer-intent reality

Semrush AI Visibility gives AdGreetz a score of 33/100 — the highest among this competitor set. But when you look at what Semrush is actually tracking, the picture changes dramatically. AdGreetz’s top topic is “AdGreetz and Cloud Providers” — a brand-name query that no buyer would ever search for.

CompanyScoreMentionsCitationsCited PagesTop LLM
adgreetz.com33/100241113ChatGPT (58.3%)
smartly.io22/100795423289AI Mode (28.7%)
celtra.com20/100244217112AI Mode (30.7%)
innovid.com18/100206195187AI Mode (32.5%)
Semrush AI Visibility dashboard for adgreetz.com showing score 33/100
Semrush AI Visibilityadgreetz.com — Score: 33/100 (Low)
Semrush topics for adgreetz.com
Semrush AI Visibility — TopicsTop topic: “AdGreetz and Cloud Providers” — not buyer intent

AdGreetz scores 33/100 with just 24 mentions — the highest score but the lowest mention volume. Semrush tracks brand-name queries like “AdGreetz and Cloud Providers” (Visibility: 26, AI Volume: 204), where AdGreetz naturally gets mentioned. No real buyer searches this. This is pure brand-echo, not buyer-intent visibility. Competitors have 10–33x more mentions from actual category queries.

The Semrush Score Paradox
AdGreetz’s 33/100 is HIGHER than Innovid (18), Celtra (20), and Smartly (22). But AdGreetz has just 24 mentions vs Smartly’s 795. The high score comes from brand-name queries, not category authority.
24 Mentions vs 795 — The Real Gap
Smartly.io has 795 mentions and 423 citations. Celtra has 244. Innovid has 206. AdGreetz has 24 — mostly brand-name echoes. Our 25-query buyer-intent test confirms: 0% on all three platforms.
Innovid AI Visibility 18/100
Competitor BenchmarkInnovid — 18/100 (206 mentions)
Smartly AI Visibility 22/100
Competitor BenchmarkSmartly — 22/100 (795 mentions)
Celtra AI Visibility 20/100
Competitor BenchmarkCeltra — 20/100 (244 mentions)

Despite lower Semrush scores, Innovid (206 mentions, 195 citations), Smartly (795 mentions, 423 citations), and Celtra (244 mentions, 217 citations) massively outperform AdGreetz. This is why we use Xtrusio’s buyer-intent methodology.

Why This Matters

Semrush shows AdGreetz at 33/100 — seemingly ahead. But this is a vanity metric from brand-name queries. When real buyers ask category-level questions, AdGreetz appears zero times while competitors appear 40–50 times each.

Section 6

The Total Blackout

Why AdGreetz is invisible on every AI platform

AdGreetz’s invisibility isn’t random — it’s structural. The company’s web footprint consists primarily of self-promotional content (press releases, award announcements, its own blog). AI platforms weight third-party editorial coverage, comparison reviews, and industry analyst reports — exactly what AdGreetz lacks.

“We need an end-to-end managed solution for personalized creative production and deployment across 20+ channels. Do any platforms offer this?”

— AdGreetz’s exact pitch. ChatGPT recommends Clinch, Innovid, Smartly, Basis. Not AdGreetz.

“We need to run hyper-localized public awareness campaigns across CTV, personalized by city and state. What platforms specialize in this?”

— Mirrors AdGreetz’s NHTSA/Sinclair 720-ad CTV case study. ChatGPT recommends Hyperlocology, StackAdapt, Funnel Fyre. Not AdGreetz.

“Which platforms are integrating generative AI models into their creative workflows for producing personalized ads at scale?”

— AdGreetz launched BizGreetz AI with 56 AI models. ChatGPT recommends Pencil, Omneky, Meta Advantage+. Not AdGreetz.
Root Cause 1: No Third-Party Content Footprint
Clinch, Innovid, Celtra, and Smartly appear in Forrester Waves, G2/Capterra reviews, ad-tech trade publications (AdExchanger, Digiday), and practitioner comparison articles. AdGreetz has none of these. AI platforms train on this kind of content.
Root Cause 2: Every Differentiator Already Owned
“56 AI models” → Innovid Orchestrator. “24 channels” → Clinch omnichannel. “Millions of ad variations” → Jivox. “CTV personalization” → Innovid. “End-to-end managed” → MNTN, Flashtalking. Every claim is already occupied.
Root Cause 3: Awards Don’t Create AI Visibility
MarTech Breakthrough Awards, TikTok partnership, NHTSA case study, National CineMedia partnership, Wikipedia page — none of these register. AI platforms weight ongoing, broad-based third-party content far more than press releases or award announcements.
Great Product. Zero AI Visibility.

AdGreetz has Amazon, P&G, BMW, Disney as clients and $9.2M in revenue. The product exists. The results exist. But AI platforms don’t know any of this. When 80+ competitors get named and AdGreetz gets zero, the problem isn’t the product — it’s the content distribution strategy.

Section 7

AI Topic Authority Map

Every category AdGreetz claims — and who actually owns it in AI

TopicAI LeaderAdGreetz Status
Omnichannel DCO (22+ channels)Clinch / FlashtalkingINVISIBLE — 0/75
CTV/OTT PersonalizationInnovid / MadhiveINVISIBLE — 0/75
Millions of Ad VariationsJivox / Celtra / SmartlyINVISIBLE — 0/75
AI Creative ProductionPencil / Omneky / InnovidINVISIBLE — 0/75
End-to-End Managed ServiceClinch / MNTN / FlashtalkingINVISIBLE — 0/75
Personalized Video CRMSundaySky / IdomooINVISIBLE — 0/75
Government Geo-Targeted CTVMadhive / Simpli.fiINVISIBLE — 0/75
Automotive Dealer CampaignsClinch / Jivox / Catalyst IQINVISIBLE — 0/75
Creative Ad Tech LandscapeClinch / Innovid / Smartly / CeltraINVISIBLE — 0/75
Social Ad Fatigue SolutionsSmartly / Hunch / MarpipeINVISIBLE — 0/75
Topic Cluster
ChatGPT
Gemini
Claude
Creative Automation
0%
0%
0%
CTV Personalization
0%
0%
0%
DCO Platforms
0%
0%
0%
Omnichannel DCO
0%
0%
0%
Vendor Landscape
0%
0%
0%
AI Creative
0%
0%
0%
Creative Automation
ChatGPT0%
Gemini0%
Claude0%
CTV Personalization
ChatGPT0%
Gemini0%
Claude0%
DCO Platforms
ChatGPT0%
Gemini0%
Claude0%
Omnichannel DCO
ChatGPT0%
Gemini0%
Claude0%
Vendor Landscape
ChatGPT0%
Gemini0%
Claude0%
AI Creative
ChatGPT0%
Gemini0%
Claude0%
Section 8

Methodology

How we conducted this Xtrusio AEO/GEO Audit

This assessment uses manual buyer-intent testing across AI platforms to reveal the real competitive landscape for AdGreetz — going beyond brand claims to test what media buyers and marketing leaders actually ask AI when evaluating personalized ad-tech platforms.

Competitor Intelligence
Mapped AdGreetz against 80+ competing platforms identified across ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude. Top 5 competitors (Innovid, Clinch, Smartly, Celtra, Jivox) analyzed for citation frequency, platform distribution, and category ownership.
Manual 25-Query Buyer-Intent Testing
Tested 25 decision-maker intent queries across ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude. Questions designed to mirror real VP/Director-level research during vendor evaluation for personalized video, DCO, CTV, and omnichannel ad platforms.
Dual Verification
Each platform was tested twice with fresh responses to confirm the 0/75 result. New responses named even more vendors (60+ on ChatGPT alone) but AdGreetz still did not appear. Triple-zero confirmed with full re-verification.
Section 9

Recommendations

Building AI visibility from zero requires a fundamentally different content strategy

Phase 1 — 0–30 Days
Build the Third-Party Content Foundation
  • Get listed and reviewed on G2 and Capterra (the #1 source AI platforms train on for vendor recommendations)
  • Publish technical documentation hub (API docs, integration guides, developer resources) — Innovid/Clinch have this; AdGreetz doesn’t
  • Create detailed comparison pages: “AdGreetz vs Clinch,” “AdGreetz vs Innovid,” “AdGreetz vs Smartly”
  • Publish P&G, BMW, Amazon case studies with specific metrics on own domain (not just press releases)
Phase 2 — 30–90 Days
Own Category-Defining Content
  • Publish “State of Personalized CTV Advertising” annual report with proprietary data (Innovid does this — AdGreetz should too)
  • Pitch coverage to AdExchanger, Digiday, MarTech Today with bylined thought leadership from Eric Frankel
  • Create “How to Choose a Personalized Video Platform: The Complete Buyer’s Guide” (address Q7 and Q22 directly)
  • Submit for Forrester Wave inclusion (Clinch, Innovid, Smartly all participate — AdGreetz does not)
Phase 3 — 90+ Days
Scale and Monitor AI Visibility
  • Build a community/knowledge hub with tutorials, webinars, and integration guides (creates the practitioner content AI trains on)
  • Launch open-source tools or free-tier access to attract developer/practitioner mentions in blogs and forums
  • Quarterly Xtrusio re-audits to track progress from 0/75 baseline
Continuous AI Visibility Tracking
Ad-tech companies can track their AI discovery trajectory using generative engine optimization tools like Xtrusio. An answer engine optimization platform measures whether new content is being picked up by AI systems — quarterly re-audits track progress from this 0/75 baseline.

The Gap is Fixable. The Window is Now.

Before Clinch and Innovid widen the lead, let’s build AdGreetz’s AI visibility from zero.

This research report was generated using the Xtrusio Company Intelligence Module, which evaluates how a company appears across multiple AI systems and knowledge sources.