Xtrusio AEO/GEO Audit

Jasper wins on every AI platform.

Tofu doesn’t exist.

25-query audit across ChatGPT, Gemini & Claude. Tofu is cited on 0 of 75 responses (0%). Despite $17M in funding, TechCrunch coverage, and enterprise clients like RingCentral and Wunderkind, Tofu is completely invisible when B2B marketers ask AI for help.

This report was generated using Xtrusio, an AI visibility and demand intelligence platform that analyzes how companies appear across modern AI systems such as ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, and other generative engines.

The insights in this page are generated using Xtrusio’s proprietary research and content intelligence framework.

April 2026
25 Queries • 3 Platforms
Tofu
0%
ChatGPT
0 of 25 queries
⚠ INVISIBLE
0%
Gemini
0 of 25 queries
⚠ INVISIBLE
0%
Claude
0 of 25 queries
⚠ INVISIBLE
Triple Zero: Complete AI Invisibility

0 citations. 0 platforms. 0 visibility.

Tofu scored 0/75 across all three AI platforms — a triple zero. Every question was designed to surface Tofu’s exact product: AI-powered ABM content generation, multi-channel campaign orchestration, and martech consolidation. Instead, AI recommends Jasper (~46 citations), HubSpot (~29), 6sense (~28), Demandbase (~28), and Clay (~22). Even newer competitors like Mutiny, Regie.ai, and Typeface appear. Tofu does not.

Section 2

Platform Scorecard

Tofu citation rate across AI platforms

Tofu Citation Rate by Platform
ChatGPT
0%
Claude
0%
Gemini
0%
Competitor Comparison — Combined Citation Rates (approx.)
Jasper
~61%
HubSpot AI
~39%
6sense
~37%
Demandbase
~37%
Clay
~29%
Copy.ai
~27%
Mutiny
~11%
Tofu
0%
Jasper Dominance
Jasper appears in ~61% of all AI responses across all three platforms. It owns the “AI content generation for B2B marketing” category so thoroughly that Tofu’s positioning as “Jasper + campaign orchestration” simply doesn’t register.
Even Newer Tools Outrank Tofu
Clay (~29%), Regie.ai, Typeface, and Mutiny (~11%) all appear in AI responses. These companies have generated more third-party editorial coverage and community discussion than Tofu despite similar or smaller funding.
Section 3

AI Visibility Leaderboard

Who owns the AI conversation — total citations across all platforms

Platform-by-Platform Breakdown
ChatGPT
0/25
Tofu cited
Claude
0/25
Tofu cited
Gemini
0/25
Tofu cited
Jasper
20
22
4
~46
HubSpot AI
12
13
4
~29
6sense
10
13
5
~28
Demandbase
10
11
7
~28
Clay
10
8
4
~22
Tofu
0
ChatGPT
Claude
Gemini
Citation Leaderboard
Jasper: ~46 citations (61% of 75 responses) HubSpot: ~29 citations (39% of 75 responses) Tofu: 0 citations (0% of 75 responses)
0%
Tofu
Jasper~46
HubSpot AI~29
Tofu0
Citation Intensity Heatmap
ChatGPT
Claude
Gemini
Total
Jasper
~20
~22
~4
~46
HubSpot AI
~12
~13
~4
~29
6sense
~10
~13
~5
~28
Demandbase
~10
~11
~7
~28
Clay
~10
~8
~4
~22
Copy.ai
~5
~14
~1
~20
Tofu
0
Triple Zero
Tofu is the only company in this audit to score 0 citations across all three AI platforms. Every competitor — including newer, less-funded alternatives — has more AI visibility.
Jasper’s Category Ownership
With ~46/75 combined citations, Jasper owns the “AI content generation for B2B marketing” category. Tofu’s differentiated positioning (content gen + campaign orchestration) has not penetrated AI training data.
Section 4

AI Positioning Audit

25 buyer-intent queries — click any row to see the exact question

Each query was written from the perspective of a real B2B marketing leader researching AI-powered campaign platforms, ABM tools, and martech consolidation solutions. These personas represent the buyers whose AI search results determine whether Tofu gets discovered.

HP
Director, ABX and Growth Marketing
Wunderkind • MarTech • London, UK
7queries
Pain Points
Scaling ABM for 500+ target accounts, personalizing content per sub-vertical without 2+ days per account, Marketo integration for email personalization at scale.
“AI tools for ABM at scale”“personalize landing pages per account”
Q1, Q2, Q3, Q5, Q13, Q14, Q21
NR
AVP Global Marketing Operations
RingCentral • UCaaS / Enterprise SaaS • US
7queries
Pain Points
Consolidating 6+ martech tools, enabling 120+ marketing users with AI, reducing headcount requests while scaling campaign output 10x.
“consolidate martech stack with AI”“marketing ops AI platform”
Q4, Q6, Q9, Q11, Q15, Q19, Q22
MS
VP of Marketing
B2B SaaS • Laguna Niguel, CA
6queries
Pain Points
Small team (4-8 marketers) with enterprise ambitions. Needs AI to replace agency and do ABM, content, lifecycle, events simultaneously.
“AI marketing for small B2B team”“best AI tool replace marketing agency”
Q7, Q8, Q10, Q12, Q17, Q18
SB
VP Marketing, Demand Gen & Growth
B2B SaaS • Canada
5queries
Pain Points
Measuring ROI on AI campaigns, lifecycle marketing automation, multilingual campaign creation for global teams, compliance-sensitive industries.
“AI campaign ROI attribution B2B”“multilingual B2B marketing AI”
Q16, Q20, Q23, Q24, Q25
#Query TopicClusterClaudeChatGPTGemini
1Small team ABM at 200 accountsABM Scale
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“My B2B SaaS marketing team is only 4 people but we need to run ABM campaigns for 200 target accounts. What AI tools can help us personalize content at that scale without hiring more people?”

2Personalized landing pages, emails, adsABM Scale
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“We\u2019re evaluating AI marketing platforms that can generate personalized landing pages, emails, and ads for individual target accounts. What are the best options in 2026?”

3Reduce per-account creation timeABM Scale
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“I\u2019m a VP of Demand Gen at a mid-market SaaS company. We\u2019re spending 2-3 days per account creating personalized ABM assets. How can AI help us get that down to minutes?”

4Multi-channel single-platformPlatform
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“What AI-powered platforms can help B2B marketers create and execute multi-channel campaigns from a single tool \u2014 covering email, landing pages, ads, and social media?”

51:1 ABM + content gen + orchestrationABM Scale
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“We want to move beyond generic marketing automation and start doing true 1:1 account-based marketing. What platforms combine AI content generation with campaign orchestration?”

6HubSpot + Marketo integrationIntegration
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“Our marketing team uses HubSpot for CRM and Marketo for email automation. What AI marketing tools integrate well with this stack to help us personalize campaigns at scale?”

7Content repurposing across channelsContent
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“I need to repurpose a single piece of content \u2014 like a webinar or whitepaper \u2014 into dozens of channel-specific assets for different personas and industries. What AI tools can do this efficiently?”

8AI outbound prospectingOutbound
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“What are the best AI tools for B2B outbound prospecting that can research accounts and generate personalized email sequences automatically?”

9Martech consolidationPlatform
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“We\u2019re a series B SaaS company trying to consolidate our martech stack. We currently use 6 different tools for content, email, ABM, and ads. Are there AI platforms that can replace multiple point solutions?”

10Enterprise teams using AIEnterprise
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“How are enterprise B2B marketing teams using AI to reduce campaign creation time in 2026? What specific platforms are they using?”

11Brand voice at scaleBrand
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“I\u2019m looking for an AI marketing platform that can maintain our brand voice and style guidelines while generating large volumes of personalized content. What should I consider?”

12ChatGPT vs dedicated platformComparison
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“What\u2019s the difference between using ChatGPT for marketing content versus a purpose-built AI marketing platform? When does it make sense to invest in a dedicated tool?”

13Scale ABM beyond 20 accountsABM Scale
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“Our ABM program is stuck at 20 accounts because we can\u2019t scale the personalization. What AI platforms help B2B teams run 1:1 ABM for 100+ accounts simultaneously?”

14Post-event follow-up automationEvents
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“I need to create personalized post-event follow-up campaigns for webinar attendees segmented by industry, seniority, and engagement level. What AI tools automate this?”

15Enterprise B2B complex salesEnterprise
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“What AI marketing platforms are best suited for enterprise B2B companies with complex sales cycles and multiple buyer personas?”

16Compliance content for finservIndustry
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“We\u2019re a B2B SaaS company selling to financial services. Our marketing needs to address compliance-sensitive messaging for different regulatory environments. Can AI marketing tools handle industry-specific content personalization?”

17AI-native platforms since 2023Vendor
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“What are the top AI-native marketing platforms that have emerged since 2023 specifically designed for B2B demand generation?”

18Customer marketing AICustomer
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“I\u2019m evaluating AI tools that can help my customer marketing team create personalized case studies, renewal campaigns, and expansion outreach. What options exist?”

19Brand consistency at scaleBrand
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“How do AI marketing platforms handle brand consistency when generating content at scale? I\u2019m worried about losing our brand voice.”

20Always-on lifecycle nurtureLifecycle
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“We want to build always-on nurture campaigns that automatically adapt content based on buyer behavior, industry, and persona. What AI platforms enable this kind of lifecycle marketing automation?”

21Sales enablement per accountSales
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“What AI tools can help us create personalized sales enablement materials \u2014 like one-pagers and battle cards \u2014 for each target account our sales team is pursuing?”

22Build vs buy AI workflowComparison
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“I\u2019m a marketing leader evaluating whether to build an in-house AI content workflow using APIs versus buying a complete AI marketing platform. What are the trade-offs?”

23Analytics + feedback loopsAnalytics
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“What AI marketing platforms offer the best analytics and feedback loops so we can measure what content and campaigns are actually driving pipeline?”

24Multilingual campaign creationGlobal
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“We need an AI tool that can handle multilingual campaign creation for our global marketing team. What B2B marketing platforms support content generation in multiple languages?”

25ROI attribution for AI campaignsAnalytics
Exact question asked across all AI platforms:

“Our marketing team is under pressure to show ROI on every campaign. What AI marketing platforms have the strongest attribution and performance tracking capabilities for B2B?”

TOTAL0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)
Section 5

Semrush AI Visibility

Automated scores vs buyer-intent reality

Semrush AI Visibility gives tofuhq.com a score of 15/100 — “Low — Rarely mentioned in LLM outputs compared to competitors.” But even this overstates Tofu’s position. The 32 mentions Semrush tracks are on generic topics — the top performing topic is “Xero Bank Reconciliation”, which has nothing to do with Tofu’s actual product. When we tested 25 buyer-intent questions that perfectly match Tofu’s positioning, the result was 0/75.

CompanyScoreMentionsCitationsBuyer-Intent
tofuhq.com15/10032480%
jasper.ai48/10015.7K4.1K~61%
copy.ai34/1005.8K3.8K~27%
mutinyhq.com17/10037899~11%
Tofu AI Visibility Dashboard showing 15/100 score
Semrush AI VisibilityTofu AI Visibility Dashboard — Score: 15/100
Tofu Topics showing Xero Bank Reconciliation as top topic
Semrush AI Visibility — TopicsTofu Topics — “Xero Bank Reconciliation” is the #1 topic

Tofu’s Semrush dashboard shows 32 mentions and 48 citations — but the Topics tab reveals the fatal flaw: the #1 performing topic is “Xero Bank Reconciliation,” an accounting query with zero relevance to Tofu’s AI marketing platform. This confirms massive brand dilution — Semrush is tracking mentions of “tofu” as a generic term (top-of-funnel acronym), not the company.

Jasper AI Visibility Dashboard showing 48/100 score
Competitor BenchmarkJasper — Score: 48/100 • 15.7K mentions
Copy.ai AI Visibility Dashboard showing 34/100 score
Competitor BenchmarkCopy.ai — Score: 34/100 • 5.8K mentions
Mutiny AI Visibility Dashboard showing 17/100 score
Competitor BenchmarkMutiny — Score: 17/100 • 378 mentions

Jasper dominates with 15.7K mentions (490x Tofu’s count) and a 48/100 score. Even Mutiny, with a similar low score (17/100), has 378 mentions vs Tofu’s 32. The gap in third-party editorial coverage, comparison reviews, and community discussion is the root cause of Tofu’s AI invisibility.

Brand Name Dilution
“ToFu” is universally known as “Top of Funnel” in marketing — a generic acronym used in thousands of articles. This dilutes Tofu’s brand signal in AI training data, making it nearly impossible for models to distinguish the company from the concept.
Semrush Tracks Noise, Not Signal
The top tracked topic for tofuhq.com is “Xero Bank Reconciliation” — an accounting query. Semrush’s automated system is conflating the brand with unrelated mentions. This is why companies rely on Xtrusio’s buyer-intent methodology.
Section 6

The Triple Zero

0 citations across ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude — complete AI invisibility

Unlike most audits where we identify a gap on one platform, Tofu faces a unique challenge: total invisibility on every AI platform. The questions below are tailor-made for Tofu’s exact product positioning — and every platform recommends competitors instead.

“What AI-native marketing platforms have emerged since 2023 specifically designed for B2B demand generation?”

— Q17: Tofu was literally founded in 2023 for this exact purpose. ChatGPT recommends Clay, Typeface, Regie.ai. Gemini recommends Clay, AirOps, Attention. Claude recommends HubSpot, Marketo. None mention Tofu.

“We want to move beyond generic marketing automation and start doing true 1:1 ABM. What platforms combine AI content generation with campaign orchestration?”

— Q5: This is Tofu’s exact pitch. All 3 platforms recommend Demandbase, 6sense, and HubSpot. Tofu is absent.

“We’re a series B SaaS company trying to consolidate our martech stack. Are there AI platforms that can replace multiple point solutions?”

— Q9: Tofu’s “replace point solutions” message. ChatGPT suggests HubSpot, Salesforce MC, Adobe GenStudio, Jasper, Clay. Tofu is nowhere.
25 Questions, 0 Mentions
Every single question — across ABM scale (Q1-Q5, Q13), martech consolidation (Q4, Q9), content generation (Q7, Q11, Q19), enterprise adoption (Q10, Q15), outbound (Q8), events (Q14), analytics (Q23, Q25) — returns zero Tofu citations on zero platforms.
The “Tofu” Name Problem
“ToFu” appears in thousands of marketing articles as the “Top of Funnel” acronym. AI models cannot distinguish Tofu the company from ToFu the concept. This is a structural brand discoverability barrier that content alone cannot fix.
Same Questions. Every Platform. Never Tofu.

$17M in funding. Index Ventures and SignalFire backing. TechCrunch coverage. Enterprise clients like RingCentral and Wunderkind. None of it translates into AI visibility. When a VP of Demand Gen asks any AI platform for the exact solution Tofu builds, they get Jasper, HubSpot, 6sense, Demandbase, and Clay. Tofu’s web presence has not generated the third-party editorial coverage, comparison reviews, and community discussion that AI models use to recommend products.

Section 7

AI Topic Authority Map

Which categories Tofu owns in AI answers

TopicAI LeaderTofu Status
ABM Content Personalization at ScaleJasper / DemandbaseINVISIBLE (0/3)
Multi-Channel Campaign OrchestrationHubSpot / Salesforce MCINVISIBLE (0/3)
AI Content Generation for B2BJasperINVISIBLE (0/3)
Martech Stack ConsolidationHubSpot / JasperINVISIBLE (0/3)
AI Outbound ProspectingClay / ApolloINVISIBLE (0/3)
Brand Voice Consistency at ScaleWriter / JasperINVISIBLE (0/3)
Enterprise B2B Marketing AI6sense / DemandbaseINVISIBLE (0/3)
AI-Native Platforms (post-2023)Clay / Typeface / Regie.aiINVISIBLE (0/3)
Lifecycle Marketing AutomationHubSpot / ActiveCampaignINVISIBLE (0/3)
Sales Enablement AISeismic / HighspotINVISIBLE (0/3)
Topic Cluster
ChatGPT
Claude
Gemini
ABM Scale
0%
0%
0%
Platform Consolidation
0%
0%
0%
Content Marketing
0%
0%
0%
Enterprise Adoption
0%
0%
0%
Analytics / Attribution
0%
0%
0%
ABM Scale
ChatGPT0%
Claude0%
Gemini0%
Platform Consolidation
ChatGPT0%
Claude0%
Gemini0%
Content Marketing
ChatGPT0%
Claude0%
Gemini0%
Enterprise Adoption
ChatGPT0%
Claude0%
Gemini0%
Analytics / Attribution
ChatGPT0%
Claude0%
Gemini0%
0 Categories Owned
Tofu is invisible in every single topic category: ABM, multi-channel orchestration, content generation, martech consolidation, enterprise AI, outbound, lifecycle, and analytics. Not a single AI platform associates Tofu with any buyer-intent topic.
10 Categories Lost to Competitors
Jasper owns AI content generation. HubSpot owns multi-channel. 6sense and Demandbase own ABM/intent. Clay owns data enrichment. Writer owns brand voice. Even the “AI-native since 2023” category is owned by Clay and Typeface — not Tofu.
Section 8

Methodology

How we conducted this Xtrusio AEO/GEO Audit

Semrush AI Visibility Data
Pulled Semrush AI Visibility reports for tofuhq.com and 3 competitors (jasper.ai, copy.ai, mutinyhq.com). Analyzed scores, mentions, cited pages, and LLM distribution.
25-Query Buyer-Intent Testing
Tested 25 decision-maker intent queries across ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude. Questions mirror real VP/Director-level marketing leaders researching AI campaign platforms, ABM tools, and martech consolidation during discovery.
Competitor Scope
Jasper (AI writing for enterprise), Copy.ai (GTM workflows), Mutiny (ABM web personalization), Clay (data enrichment), 6sense (intent data), Demandbase (ABM platform), HubSpot (CRM + AI). All compete for the same B2B marketing buyer during discovery.
Section 9

Recommendations

Prioritized actions to build AI visibility from zero

Phase 1 — 0–30 Days
Fix the Brand Signal Problem
  • Address the “ToFu” brand name dilution: consistently use “Tofu (tofuhq.com)” or “Tofu AI marketing platform” in all third-party content to differentiate from the “Top of Funnel” acronym
  • Publish 5-10 comparison articles on third-party sites (not just tofuhq.com/post): “Tofu vs Jasper”, “Tofu vs HubSpot”, “Tofu vs 6sense for ABM” on G2, Capterra, independent review sites
  • Create structured data (FAQ schema, Product schema) on tofuhq.com for all comparison and category pages
Phase 2 — 30–90 Days
Generate Third-Party Editorial Coverage
  • Get listed and reviewed on G2 and Capterra in the “AI Marketing” and “ABM Platform” categories — AI models heavily index these review aggregators
  • Secure inclusion in 10+ “best AI marketing tools 2026” and “best ABM platforms” listicles on independent publisher sites (not Tofu-authored comparison pages)
  • Publish case studies as guest posts on industry blogs (Demand Gen Report, MarTech, CMSWire) — not just on tofuhq.com
Phase 3 — 90+ Days
Scale Category Presence
  • Build community discussion presence: Reddit (r/marketing, r/b2bmarketing), LinkedIn thought leadership from founders, podcast appearances
  • Target Gartner/Forrester inclusion in Magic Quadrant or Wave for marketing automation — analyst coverage drives AI model recommendations
  • Quarterly Xtrusio re‑audits to track progress from 0% baseline
Continuous AI Visibility Tracking
Brands can improve their AI discovery using generative engine optimization tools like Xtrusio. With a 0% baseline, every improvement is measurable.

Ready to go from 0% to visible?

Let’s build Tofu’s AI visibility from the ground up.

This research report was generated using the Xtrusio Company Intelligence Module.